On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:12:51PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
>> > Yes, the patch definitely works. It is part of Fedora's GRUB2 src-rpm
>> > package. But I changed the 10_linux
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:12:51PM -0600, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> > Yes, the patch definitely works. It is part of Fedora's GRUB2 src-rpm
> > package. But I changed the 10_linux.in file manually before compiling grub2.
> > The strange t
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:22 AM, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:08:45 +0100
>> From: Robert Millan
>> Subject: Re: Changes in GRUB help
>> To: The development of GNU GRUB
>> Message-ID: <20100125080845.gi13...@thorin>
>> Content-Type:
>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:08:45 +0100
> From: Robert Millan
> Subject: Re: Changes in GRUB help
> To: The development of GNU GRUB
> Message-ID: <20100125080845.gi13...@thorin>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:15:11PM +0530, KESHAV P.R. wrote:
> * Add support for Fedora's initramfs (semi-patch attached) - name like
> initramfs-2.6.31.9-174.fc12.x86_64.img .
Your patch looks like it ought to work; have you tested it?
> Please document grub-extras in grub.enbug.org website.
Y