"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:27, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> grub-help@ or grub-users@ would be more fit for user discussions. Are
>> there any GNU "standards" for these? And perhaps require to switch to
>> subscribe only lists.
>
> This might be
On Sunday 16 December 2007 12:02, Robert Millan wrote:
> Another question is, how will we do context reply for patches? The BTS
> doesn't seem to easily allow this. Maybe we could followup on our replies
> via bug-grub ? But a problem with that is that it'll be hard to see the
> full context of
On Sunday 16 December 2007 11:27, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> grub-help@ or grub-users@ would be more fit for user discussions. Are
> there any GNU "standards" for these? And perhaps require to switch to
> subscribe only lists.
This might be the third time to say this, but...
help-grub is already
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:14:30PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> No, the reaction to from Okuji was that if we have a bugtracker, it
> needs to be available. So if one of us sets up a bugtracker, we have
> no guarantee about availability. With savannah we have this.
Well, Savannah isn't free of
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 01:22:44PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
> should we adjust that to make them use the BTS?
> >>> Yes.
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
- The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
should we adjust that to make them use the BTS?
>>> Yes. And for grub legacy users (and version info what is grub legacy)
>>> there s
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:02:35PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - The website still prompts to send GRUB 2 queries to grub-devel,
> > > should we adjust that to make them use the BTS?
> >
> > Yes. And for grub legacy users (and version info what is grub legacy)
> > there should be note th
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:27:03PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > The creature has been seized:
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
> >
> > I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse
> > much of GRUB Legacy's and they will
Robert Millan wrote:
> The creature has been seized:
>
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
>
> I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse
> much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply.
>
> Finally the BTS is usable for keeping track of GRUB 2 stuff.
>
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 15:37, Robert Millan wrote:
> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
No problem for me.
Okuji
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
>
> Did anyone comment on the trac-based solution I mentioned? If someone
> did, I missed it, sorry.
No, the reaction to from Okuji was tha
The creature has been seized:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=grub
I've left the bugs that apply to documentation since we'll probably reuse
much of GRUB Legacy's and they will still apply.
Finally the BTS is usable for keeping track of GRUB 2 stuff.
Two thoughts:
- The website still
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:51:17PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
>
> Did anyone comment on the trac-based solution I mentioned? If someone
> did, I missed it, sorry.
My comment was:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
Did anyone comment on the trac-based solution I mentioned? If someone
did, I missed it, sorry.
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 12, 2007 10:37 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
>
This is a very good idea, many old items are inappropriate anyway.
--
Bean
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://
No response? Does anybody object if I proceed?
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 01:01:23PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to overhaul the GRUB BTS in Savannah so that it can be used to
> track bugs in (or feature requests for) GRUB 2.
>
> What I propose to do is review all bugs, and:
16 matches
Mail list logo
