Re: [multiboot] abstractmbi, modules

2010-01-20 Thread Grégoire Sutre
Seth Goldberg wrote: The latest version of Solaris xVM (based on Xen 3.4) is bootable from GRUB2, so that confirms that the bug was fixed in 3.4, so please give that a try. Indeed, Xen 3.4.2 (i386) boots fine with GRUB 2. For the record, the command I used is: grub> multiboot (...)/xen.

Re: [multiboot] abstractmbi, modules

2010-01-19 Thread Seth Goldberg
Hi, The latest version of Solaris xVM (based on Xen 3.4) is bootable from GRUB2, so that confirms that the bug was fixed in 3.4, so please give that a try. --S Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Tue, 19 Jan 2010: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:01:21PM +0100, Grégoire Sutre wro

Re: [multiboot] abstractmbi, modules

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:01:21PM +0100, Grégoire Sutre wrote: > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> It's known problem: xen makes inappropriate assumptions about mbi placement > > I'm wondering why it works with the NetBSD boot-loader. What are these > assumptions? Loader in GRU

Re: [multiboot] abstractmbi, modules

2010-01-14 Thread Grégoire Sutre
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: It's known problem: xen makes inappropriate assumptions about mbi placement I'm wondering why it works with the NetBSD boot-loader. What are these assumptions? Grégoire ___ Grub-devel mailing list G

Re: [multiboot] abstractmbi, modules

2010-01-14 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Grégoire Sutre wrote: > Hi, > > I made some tests with the people/phcoder/abstractmbi branch, but I'm > a bit late reporting them... Better late than never I guess :-) > > I compiled the branch and installed GRUB from Linux on a USB stick, > and then booted my NetBSD box from the stick, with multi