Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:27:20PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
>>> Could this be made more transparent? For example, with a variable.
>>>
>> Here perhaps it could be. But in other usage cases like putting the dos
>> boot files into the right place or doing swapfso it couldn't.
>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:27:20PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> >
> > Could this be made more transparent? For example, with a variable.
> >
> Here perhaps it could be. But in other usage cases like putting the dos
> boot files into the right place or doing swapfso it couldn't.
We intentionally don'
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:25:51PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:42:44AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
Hello, all.
For some FS sometimes additional functions are needed. It could be some
type of control (e.g. in ZFS manage
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 02:25:51PM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:42:44AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> >> Hello, all.
> >> For some FS sometimes additional functions are needed. It could be some
> >> type of control (e.g. in ZFS manage zpools) or preparation
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:42:44AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
>> Hello, all.
>> For some FS sometimes additional functions are needed. It could be some
>> type of control (e.g. in ZFS manage zpools) or preparation for OS
>> booting (e.g. in FAT put IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS at the begi
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:42:44AM +0200, phcoder wrote:
> Hello, all.
> For some FS sometimes additional functions are needed. It could be some
> type of control (e.g. in ZFS manage zpools) or preparation for OS
> booting (e.g. in FAT put IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS at the begining of the
> root director
