At Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:25:49 +0100,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> But now it might be better to change my mind, since even _you_ misunderstand
> it. If you don't get it, how many people would understand?
If you consider it a separate project, it's probably better to make it
a real separate proje
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 11:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:08:46AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 November 2006 11:18, Tomáš Ebenlendr wrote:
> > > What about having
> > > "Multiboot's" header as a part of "Multiboot project".
> >
> > Multiboot Specific
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 11:59, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> You completely miss the point that we want to have header files and
> example code that can be used by other projects to implement
> multiboot.
*sigh* Sleep well, and reconsider what I have said.
Okuji
__
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:08:46AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 11:18, Tomáš Ebenlendr wrote:
> > What about having
> > "Multiboot's" header as a part of "Multiboot project".
>
> Multiboot Specification is not a part of GRUB in any sense. It is discussed
> in
>
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:11:37AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 23:50, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > Nothing prevents you from writing a C library - the POSIX and C
> > standards are available independently. Yet the C library is under
> > LGPL. Also nothing prevents you
On Sunday 26 November 2006 23:50, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Nothing prevents you from writing a C library - the POSIX and C
> standards are available independently. Yet the C library is under
> LGPL. Also nothing prevents you from writing an ogg vorbis
> implementation, but the FSF advocated the BSD
On Sunday 26 November 2006 11:18, Tomáš Ebenlendr wrote:
> And should the multiboot header file be "Grub's"?
If the header is written for GRUB, yes. If it has no relationship with GRUB,
no. That's very simple.
> What about having
> "Multiboot's" header as a part of "Multiboot project".
Multib
At Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:56:50 +0100,
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 23:48, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > > An exception is exactly what I am proposing. What is your objection?
> > >
> > > The GNU Project endorses the use of GPL to promote freedom. Don't forget
> > > tha
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 11:18 +0100, Tomáš Ebenlendr wrote:
>
> >> There is plenty of precedent here. So I still see nothing wrong
> with
> >> putting a header file, which describes an interface, under a
> non-GPL
> >> license.
> >
> > Because GRUB is not a library. The spec is available independent
>> There is plenty of precedent here. So I still see nothing wrong with
>> putting a header file, which describes an interface, under a non-GPL
>> license.
>
> Because GRUB is not a library. The spec is available independently, so
> you can write your own header easily. Nothing prevents you from d
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 23:48, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > An exception is exactly what I am proposing. What is your objection?
> >
> > The GNU Project endorses the use of GPL to promote freedom. Don't forget
> > that GRUB is a part of GNU.
>
> The GNU project also includes GCC, which is us
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 00:15 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 22:10, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 22:33 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:16, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > > I've placed a generic multiboot.h dir
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 22:10, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 22:33 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:16, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > > I've placed a generic multiboot.h directly into include/ (not in the
> > > grub subdirectory), since it it
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 22:33 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:16, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > I've placed a generic multiboot.h directly into include/ (not in the
> > grub subdirectory), since it it suitable for using in kernels
> > independently of GRUB. As for the
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:16, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> I've placed a generic multiboot.h directly into include/ (not in the
> grub subdirectory), since it it suitable for using in kernels
> independently of GRUB. As for the license, I believe that
> include/multiboot.h should NOT be GPL, to a
15 matches
Mail list logo
