On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 12:11:39PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:32:40 +0200
> Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 01:43:18PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 May 2022 09:09:38 +0200
> > > Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Ma
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:32:40 +0200
Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 01:43:18PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 May 2022 09:09:38 +0200
> > Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:55:52PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 09 May 202
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 01:43:18PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2022 09:09:38 +0200
> Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:55:52PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > On Mon, 09 May 2022 22:27:30 +0200
> > > Josselin Poiret wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello everyo
On Sun, 29 May 2022 09:09:38 +0200
Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:55:52PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 May 2022 22:27:30 +0200
> > Josselin Poiret wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Glenn Washburn writes:
> > >
> > > > I don't really like this
On Sun, 29 May 2022 08:58:20 +0200
Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 04:47:08PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:31:58 +0200
> > Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> >
> > > Unlike LUKS1, the sector size of LUKS2 devices isn't hardcoded.
> > >
> > > Regarding
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:55:52PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2022 22:27:30 +0200
> Josselin Poiret wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Glenn Washburn writes:
> >
> > > I don't really like this, but it gets the job done and is a work-around
> > > for a peculiarity of the LU
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 04:47:08PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:31:58 +0200
> Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
>
> > Unlike LUKS1, the sector size of LUKS2 devices isn't hardcoded.
> >
> > Regarding the probe command, the following values of --target switch
> > are affected:
On Mon, 09 May 2022 22:27:30 +0200
Josselin Poiret wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Glenn Washburn writes:
>
> > I don't really like this, but it gets the job done and is a work-around
> > for a peculiarity of the LUKS2 backend. The cheat mount code for
> > cryptodisk does only calls scan() and no
Hello everyone,
Glenn Washburn writes:
> I don't really like this, but it gets the job done and is a work-around
> for a peculiarity of the LUKS2 backend. The cheat mount code for
> cryptodisk does only calls scan() and not recover_key(). For LUKS1 scan
> will return a grub_cryptodisk_t with log
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:31:58 +0200
Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> Unlike LUKS1, the sector size of LUKS2 devices isn't hardcoded.
>
> Regarding the probe command, the following values of --target switch
> are affected: abstraction, arc_hints, baremetal_hints, bios_hints,
> cryptodisk_uuid, drive
10 matches
Mail list logo