Re: [PATCH v2] chainloader: Fix wrong break condition (must be AND not, OR)

2018-02-24 Thread C. Masloch
On at 2018-02-23 23:05 +01:00, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Applied! > > FYI, this is last time when I sent commit confirmation. > If I send one in the future then this will be rather > exception than rule. So, if you receive my reviewed-by > and patch is not committed in a week or two then it means > th

Re: [PATCH v2] chainloader: Fix wrong break condition (must be AND not, OR)

2018-02-23 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:01:19PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 03:26:35PM +0100, C. Masloch wrote: > > The definition of bpb's num_total_sectors_16 and num_total_sectors_32 > > is that either the 16-bit field is non-zero and is used (in which case > > eg mkfs.fat sets the 3

Re: [PATCH v2] chainloader: Fix wrong break condition (must be AND not, OR)

2018-02-20 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 03:26:35PM +0100, C. Masloch wrote: > The definition of bpb's num_total_sectors_16 and num_total_sectors_32 > is that either the 16-bit field is non-zero and is used (in which case > eg mkfs.fat sets the 32-bit field to zero), or it is zero and the > 32-bit field is used. Th