On 05/17/2013 01:49 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I applied this to ARM branch after fixing several grave problems
> including attempts to free statically allocated memory. The files
> originally didn't even compile.
You seem to have missed the follow-up e-mail I sent on April
I applied this to ARM branch after fixing several grave problems
including attempts to free statically allocated memory. The files
originally didn't even compile.
On 01.04.2013 18:42, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 04:16 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> Could you put the
On 01.04.2013 18:42, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 04:16 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> Could you put the library itself into a separate tar rather than patch?
>
> I recall you saying a few months ago that you'd prefer rather without
> libfdt. In fact, libfdt contain
On 04/01/2013 06:42 PM, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 04:16 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> Could you put the library itself into a separate tar rather than patch?
>
> I recall you saying a few months ago that you'd prefer rather without
> libfdt. In fact, libfdt conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/4/2013 3:15 PM, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> Actually list sets Reply-To, so it is not necessary reply-to-list.
Only badly behaved ones do. This field is for the SENDER to set ( for
instance, if they do not want to get a duplicate reply and have th
[Using reply-to-all now...]
On 04/04/2013 09:02 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/4/2013 2:22 PM, Francesco Lavra wrote:
>> On 04/02/2013 10:39 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Your patches can not b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
В Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:02:13 -0400
Phillip Susi пишет:
>Also you
> appear to be using the now popular and vile reply-to-list function to
> send replies only to the mailing list.
Actually lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/4/2013 2:22 PM, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 10:39 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Your patches can not be reviewed inline because your mail client
>> is incorrectly setting the mime type t
On 04/02/2013 10:39 PM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Your patches can not be reviewed inline because your mail client is
> incorrectly setting the mime type to application/octet-stream and the
> disposition to attachment. Please fix this.
Actually the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your patches can not be reviewed inline because your mail client is
incorrectly setting the mime type to application/octet-stream and the
disposition to attachment. Please fix this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comm
On 04/01/2013 04:16 AM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Could you put the library itself into a separate tar rather than patch?
I recall you saying a few months ago that you'd prefer rather without
libfdt. In fact, libfdt contains much more than what is needed by GRUB.
I rewrote the
Could you put the library itself into a separate tar rather than patch?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
On 03/24/2013 06:01 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> === modified file 'docs/grub.texi'
> --- docs/grub.texi2013-03-07 07:17:24 +
> +++ docs/grub.texi2013-03-24 13:24:52 +
> @@ -3372,6 +3372,7 @@
> * cpuid:: Check for CPU features
> * crc::
13 matches
Mail list logo
