On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:46:16PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >> I cannot reproduce it on x86_64 (also with mm-debug enabled) and I do
> >> not know how to load standalone image on ppc; is it possible to use QEMU
> >> to run ARM64 (I assume you have it)? If not what are options to test it?
>
01.03.2016 20:11, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> On 24 February 2016 at 17:40, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 24.02.2016 16:57, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> Could you test attached patch with your alignment fixes on top. This
>> implemen
On 24 February 2016 at 17:40, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 24.02.2016 16:57, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Could you test attached patch with your alignment fixes on top. This
> implements my idea of using shared buffers. Seems to
Le ven. 26 févr. 2016 14:48, Andrei Borzenkov a
écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > Andrei, your patch is pretty complicated and would be a subject to
> putting
> > into next branch because of its breakage potential. Issue at hand affects
> > x86
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Andrei, your patch is pretty complicated and would be a subject to putting
> into next branch because of its breakage potential. Issue at hand affects
> x86 as well. Can we split the solution from radical rework of disk.c with
Andrei, your patch is pretty complicated and would be a subject to putting
into next branch because of its breakage potential. Issue at hand affects
x86 as well. Can we split the solution from radical rework of disk.c with
optimisations?
Le mer. 24 févr. 2016 20:04, Andrei Borzenkov a
écrit :
>
24.02.2016 20:40, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> 24.02.2016 16:57, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Could you test attached patch with your alignment fixes on top. This
> implements my idea of using shared buffers. Seems to work in naive
24.02.2016 16:57, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
Could you test attached patch with your alignment fixes on top. This
implements my idea of using shared buffers. Seems to work in naive testing.
>>>
>>> Testing this with a grub-mkst
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:09:13PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >> Could you test attached patch with your alignment fixes on top. This
> >> implements my idea of using shared buffers. Seems to work in naive testing.
> >
> > Testing this with a grub-mkstandalone image, I get:
> >
> > kern/dl.c:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:56:25PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 22.02.2016 17:02, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:57:24AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> >> 19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>> >>> Some disk t
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 07:56:25PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 22.02.2016 17:02, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:57:24AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >> 19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> >>> Some disk types have allocation requirements beyond normal grub_malloc.
22.02.2016 17:02, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:57:24AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
>>> Some disk types have allocation requirements beyond normal grub_malloc.
>>> Add a function pointer to grub_disk_t and a wrapper function in
>>> ke
Rather than having extra code in all drivers, just put it in common init
like we do with log sector size
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:59 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> > Some disk types have allocation requirements beyond normal grub_malloc.
> > Add a function point
19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> Some disk types have allocation requirements beyond normal grub_malloc.
> Add a function pointer to grub_disk_t and a wrapper function in
> kern/disk.c making use of that function if available, to enable these
> disk drivers to implement their own malloc.
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:57:24AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> > Some disk types have allocation requirements beyond normal grub_malloc.
> > Add a function pointer to grub_disk_t and a wrapper function in
> > kern/disk.c making use of that function if a
19.02.2016 19:18, Leif Lindholm пишет:
> Some disk types have allocation requirements beyond normal grub_malloc.
> Add a function pointer to grub_disk_t and a wrapper function in
> kern/disk.c making use of that function if available, to enable these
> disk drivers to implement their own malloc.
T
16 matches
Mail list logo
