On 2015-07-22 00:23, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
It is possible to compile using "--target=powerpc -Wl,-EB" - this works
on all three ppc, ppc64 and ppc64le, but this means hardcoding GNU ld
dependency.
Thanks for t
В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>
> > It is possible to compile using "--target=powerpc -Wl,-EB" - this works
> > on all three ppc, ppc64 and ppc64le, but this means hardcoding GNU ld
> > dependency.
> >
> Thanks for this info.
> See attached patch
On 2015-07-16 16:30, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:05:07 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
On 16.07.2015 20:55, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
It is possible to compile using "--target=
В Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:05:07 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> On 16.07.2015 20:55, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0200
> > Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
> >
> >>
> >>> It is possible to compile using "--target=powerpc -Wl,-EB" - this w
On 16.07.2015 20:55, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0200
> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>
>>
>>> It is possible to compile using "--target=powerpc -Wl,-EB" - this works
>>> on all three ppc, ppc64 and ppc64le, but this means hardcoding GNU ld
>>> dependency
В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko пишет:
>
> > It is possible to compile using "--target=powerpc -Wl,-EB" - this works
> > on all three ppc, ppc64 and ppc64le, but this means hardcoding GNU ld
> > dependency.
> >
> Thanks for this info.
> See attached patch
> It is possible to compile using "--target=powerpc -Wl,-EB" - this works
> on all three ppc, ppc64 and ppc64le, but this means hardcoding GNU ld
> dependency.
>
Thanks for this info.
See attached patch
> So I'd rather try to produce patch for proper support of
> -mbig-endian/-mlittle-endian (inc
On 04.07.2015 08:46, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:34:10 +0200
> "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" пишет:
>
>> I think those flags disable only runtime libraries, not the code generation
>
> Yes, you are right. Clang seems to be built for the whole family, i.e.
> PowerPC, which s
On 30.06.2015 20:28, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:05:46 -0300
> Paulo Flabiano Smorigo пишет:
>
>> On 2015-06-30 11:33, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>>> What about clang?
>>
>> Not good news about clang support. This is what the toolchain team said
>> about it:
>>
>> T
В Sat, 4 Jul 2015 09:46:59 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> В Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:34:10 +0200
> "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" пишет:
>
> > I think those flags disable only runtime libraries, not the code generation
>
> Yes, you are right. Clang seems to be built for the whole family, i.e.
> P
В Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:34:10 +0200
"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" пишет:
> I think those flags disable only runtime libraries, not the code generation
Yes, you are right. Clang seems to be built for the whole family, i.e.
PowerPC, which seems to automatically include all three versions (ppc,
ppc
I think those flags disable only runtime libraries, not the code generation
Le 30 juin 2015 20:29, "Andrei Borzenkov" a écrit :
> В Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:05:46 -0300
> Paulo Flabiano Smorigo пишет:
>
> > On 2015-06-30 11:33, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > > What about clang?
> >
> > Not
В Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:05:46 -0300
Paulo Flabiano Smorigo пишет:
> On 2015-06-30 11:33, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > What about clang?
>
> Not good news about clang support. This is what the toolchain team said
> about it:
>
> The -mbig-endian option was added around April 10th, 201
On 2015-06-30 11:33, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
What about clang?
Not good news about clang support. This is what the toolchain team said
about it:
The -mbig-endian option was added around April 10th, 2014.
Unfortunately, those who implemented it only implemented it for ARM and
o
On 2015-06-30 11:29, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
Which compilers support these flags? I'm concerned of breaking old compilers
-static and -mbig-endian are listed in gcc 2.95.3 documentation for PPC.
I asked some toolchain fo
What about clang?
Le 30 juin 2015 16:30, "Andrei Borzenkov" a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > Which compilers support these flags? I'm concerned of breaking old
> compilers
> >
>
> -static and -mbig-endian are listed in gcc 2.95.3 documentati
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Which compilers support these flags? I'm concerned of breaking old compilers
>
-static and -mbig-endian are listed in gcc 2.95.3 documentation for PPC.
> Le 30 juin 2015 14:57, "Paulo Flabiano Smorigo"
> a écrit :
>>
>> lib
Which compilers support these flags? I'm concerned of breaking old compilers
Le 30 juin 2015 14:57, "Paulo Flabiano Smorigo" <
pfsmor...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> a écrit :
> libgcc dependency was removed *just* for this target because
> the distros that use ppc64el doesn't have 32-bit support on it.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
