Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/xfs: Incorrect short form directory data boundary check

2023-10-18 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:33:44PM +, Lidong Chen wrote: > After parsing of the current entry, the entry pointer is advanced > to the next entry at the end of the 'for' loop. In case where the > last entry is at the end of the data boundary, the advanced entry > pointer can point off the data b

Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/xfs: Incorrect short form directory data boundary check

2023-10-18 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:50:13PM -0400, Jon DeVree wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 19:54:15 +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > Jon, may I ask you to take a look at this patch? Does not it conflict > > with your XFS patch [1]. > > They are similar but distinct code paths. This patch is for the > XFS_

Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/xfs: Incorrect short form directory data boundary check

2023-10-17 Thread Jon DeVree
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 19:54:15 +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Jon, may I ask you to take a look at this patch? Does not it conflict > with your XFS patch [1]. > They are similar but distinct code paths. This patch is for the XFS_INODE_FORMAT_INO case, my patch is for the XFS_INODE_FORMAT_EXT and

Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs/xfs: Incorrect short form directory data boundary check

2023-10-16 Thread Daniel Kiper
Jon, may I ask you to take a look at this patch? Does not it conflict with your XFS patch [1]. Daniel [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-09/msg00110.html On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:33:44PM +, Lidong Chen wrote: > After parsing of the current entry, the entry pointer is ad