Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-27 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:04:22PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 27.03.15 at 14:53, wrote: > > On 27/03/15 13:43, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 27.03.15 at 14:32, wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote: > > We need

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-27 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 27.03.15 at 14:53, wrote: > On 27/03/15 13:43, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 27.03.15 at 14:32, wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote: > We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check > for EF

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-27 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 27/03/15 13:43, Jan Beulich wrote: On 27.03.15 at 14:32, wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote: We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support mult

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-27 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 27.03.15 at 14:32, wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote: >> > We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check >> > for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support >> > multiboot2 protocol

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-27 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:17:35PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote: > > We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check > > for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support > > multiboot2 protocol. > > ... because of ... (i.e. I can't s

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.03.15 at 00:40, wrote: > Reviewing the #ifndef CONFIG_ARM in EFI code, and the efi_enabled > usage elsewhere, > the remaining EFI tasks on ARM look like: > * Support for SetVirtualAddressMap > * Runtime service support - looks like just time function used by x86 > in get_cmos_time() * P

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-02 Thread Roy Franz
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Roy Franz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote: >>> We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check >>> for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support >>

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-02 Thread Roy Franz
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote: >> We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check >> for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support >> multiboot2 protocol. In general Xen loaded by this protoc

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-03-02 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Daniel Kiper wrote: > We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check > for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support > multiboot2 protocol. In general Xen loaded by this protocol uses > memory mappings and loaded modules in simliar way to X

Re: [PATCH 05/18] efi: split efi_enabled to efi_platform and efi_loader

2015-02-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 30.01.15 at 18:54, wrote: > We need more fine grained knowledge about EFI environment and check > for EFI platform and EFI loader separately to properly support > multiboot2 protocol. ... because of ... (i.e. I can't see from the description what the separation is good for). Looking at the