On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:58:39PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> Oh and it's limited to 2 TiB on 32bit systems, so I think it would be
> good if we find an alternative to it.
> Western Digital and Seagate sell now 2 TB disks.
Does BLKGETSIZE64 help?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy:
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 14:46 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 13:31 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:13:20AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:29
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 13:31 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:13:20AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:29:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009,
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:13:20AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:29:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 13:27 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:
Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 21:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:29:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 13:27 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:18:29AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 04:29:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 13:27 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:18:29AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 23:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06
Am Freitag, den 07.08.2009, 13:27 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:18:29AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 23:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If we'd do an arb
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:18:29AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 23:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > >
> > > If we'd do an arbitrary mapping then `grub-probe -t drive' would show
> > > the wrong grub
Am Mittwoch, den 05.08.2009, 12:50 +0200 schrieb Vladimir 'phcoder'
Serbinenko:
> > Vladimir said FreeBSD doestn't support multipath.
> Unless I mistyped I said exactly the opposite:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=geom_fox&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE&format=html
Oh
> Vladimir said FreeBSD doestn't support multipath.
Unless I mistyped I said exactly the opposite:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=geom_fox&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE&format=html
>
>
> --
> Felix Zielcke
> Proud Debian Maintainer
>
>
>
> ___
Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 23:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> >
> > If we'd do an arbitrary mapping then `grub-probe -t drive' would show
> > the wrong grub device.
> > But except from this I think that would be okay.
>
> We can
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:26:51PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> If we'd do an arbitrary mapping then `grub-probe -t drive' would show
> the wrong grub device.
> But except from this I think that would be okay.
We can never garantee that `grub-probe -t drive' will show the "right" drive,
at lea
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:43:23AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > As requested by Robert on
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:43:23AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > As requested by Robert on IRC, this is a split from my dmraid patch.
> > > On dmraid devices HDIO
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > As requested by Robert on IRC, this is a split from my dmraid patch.
> > On dmraid devices HDIO_GETGEO returns 0 for all fields, so the current
> > way of grub_util_b
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> As requested by Robert on IRC, this is a split from my dmraid patch.
> On dmraid devices HDIO_GETGEO returns 0 for all fields, so the current
> way of grub_util_biosdisk_get_grub_dev just can't work.
> So I use blkid to get the UUID o
16 matches
Mail list logo
