On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Following hunk is a regression for me:
> - return (tv.tv_sec * GRUB_TICKS_PER_SECOND
> - + (((tv.tv_sec % GRUB_TICKS_PER_SECOND) * 100 + tv.tv_usec)
> -* GRUB_TICKS_PER_SECOND / 100));
> +
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:18:03AM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> - return (tv.tv_sec * GRUB_TICKS_PER_SECOND
> >> - + (((tv.tv_sec % GRUB_TICKS_PER_SECOND) * 100 + tv.tv_usec)
> >> -* GRUB_TICKS_PER_SECOND / 100));
> >> + GRUB_COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT (GR
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>>> This turns grub-emu into a port in order to make it easier to port GRUB to
>>> new CPUs. A porter can then do the CPU port without having to worry about
>>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > This turns grub-emu into a port in order to make it easier to port GRUB to
> > new CPUs. A porter can then do the CPU port without having to worry about
> > firmware and/or hardware drivers in
Robert Millan wrote:
> This turns grub-emu into a port in order to make it easier to port GRUB to
> new CPUs. A porter can then do the CPU port without having to worry about
> firmware and/or hardware drivers initially.
>
> Patch attached. Branch is available in
> bzr+ssh://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/g
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:10:10PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> This turns grub-emu into a port in order to make it easier to port GRUB to
> new CPUs. A porter can then do the CPU port without having to worry about
> firmware and/or hardware drivers initially.
Any comments on this?
--
Rober
