On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:52:13AM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > Then we could use parttool syntax. Then parttype can be implemented like
> > grub> parttool hd0,1 type=7
> > makeactive like:
> > grub> parttool hd0,1 boot+
> > And it can even be done by one command
> > grub> parttool hd0,1 boot+ type=7
> >
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:20 AM, phcoder wrote:
> Hello
>>>
>>> It's also possible to write a wrapper
>>> parttool hd0,1 boot+
>>>
>>> Which chooses the correct tool and launches it (a tool can be easily
>>> registered as a pair of partition style name and a function). In this
>>> case
>>> we would
Hello
It's also possible to write a wrapper
parttool hd0,1 boot+
Which chooses the correct tool and launches it (a tool can be easily
registered as a pair of partition style name and a function). In this case
we wouldn't even need separate command for different partition style. We
have however t
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:28 AM, phcoder wrote:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:43 +0100, phcoder wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's the patch to add a replacement for old "makeactive" command
>>> New syntax is
>>> activate PARTITION
>>> E.g.
>>> activate hd0,1
>>
>> Is it necessary to cha
Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:43 +0100, phcoder wrote:
Here's the patch to add a replacement for old "makeactive" command
New syntax is
activate PARTITION
E.g.
activate hd0,1
Is it necessary to change the name? I think "makeactive" is a better
name for what it does.
Actually I
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:43 +0100, phcoder wrote:
> Here's the patch to add a replacement for old "makeactive" command
> New syntax is
> activate PARTITION
> E.g.
> activate hd0,1
Is it necessary to change the name? I think "makeactive" is a better
name for what it does.
Maybe we could use a mor
