On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 09:04:32PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Committed, thanks!
Btw, for --target=device and --target=drive, the new grub-probe command should
also be usable on non-i386. I think we just need to disable some code. Any
powerpc user wants to give that a try?
--
Robert Mill
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:10:49PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:06, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Ping :)
>
> Thank you for prompting me. ;)
>
> Please check it in. I have no objection.
Committed, thanks!
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note
On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:06, Robert Millan wrote:
> Ping :)
Thank you for prompting me. ;)
Please check it in. I have no objection.
Okuji
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Ping :)
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:27:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Is it alright for commit now?
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:29:33PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here are some comments about
Is it alright for commit now?
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:29:33PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here are some comments about your patch. As requested :)
>
> Thanks for the corrections. Some of them make me ashame
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:29:33PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some comments about your patch. As requested :)
Thanks for the corrections. Some of them make me ashamed, I should have
looked better at all those grub-probefs instances... ;)
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > 2006-0
Hi,
Here are some comments about your patch. As requested :)
Robert Millan wrote:
> 2006-09-23 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * util/i386/pc/getroot.c (grub_guess_root_device): Stop using
> grub_util_biosdisk_get_grub_dev to convert system device to GRUB device.
> * ut
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:37:52AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Uhm actualy, I'll need this on non-i386 too. Can we enable grub-probe.c for
> all
> platforms? If the last part (about PC/BIOS translation) is i386-specific,
> perhaps it could be conditionalised so that non-i386 can use
> --tar
Uhm actualy, I'll need this on non-i386 too. Can we enable grub-probe.c for all
platforms? If the last part (about PC/BIOS translation) is i386-specific,
perhaps it could be conditionalised so that non-i386 can use
--target=(drive|device) ?
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 05:20:37AM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> However, this usage is against the original meaning, thus the naming is not
> appropriate any longer. In addition, I don't like that we make an ad-hoc text
> output (the first line is a fs module name, the second line is a r
On Friday 22 September 2006 18:33, Robert Millan wrote:
> This would be very useful to get rid of ugly kludges in Debian, such as
> this one:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-grub/grub2/trunk/debian/update-grub?op=file&;
>rev=0&sc=0 (look for convert() here)
>
> Fortunately grub-probefs is alre
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> This would be very useful to get rid of ugly kludges in Debian, such as this
> one:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-grub/grub2/trunk/debian/update-grub?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
> (look for convert() here)
>
> Fortunately grub-pr
12 matches
Mail list logo
