On 5/9/22 21:45, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 2022-05-09 21:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 5/5/22 15:54, Stefan Agner wrote:
Despite the UEFI specification saying "the requirement is that the
start address of a buffer must be evenly divisible by IoAlign with
no remainder.", it seems that a higher
On 2022-05-09 21:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 5/5/22 15:54, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> Despite the UEFI specification saying "the requirement is that the
>> start address of a buffer must be evenly divisible by IoAlign with
>> no remainder.", it seems that a higher alignment requirement is
>> ne
On 5/5/22 15:54, Stefan Agner wrote:
Despite the UEFI specification saying "the requirement is that the
start address of a buffer must be evenly divisible by IoAlign with
no remainder.", it seems that a higher alignment requirement is
neecssary on some system (e.g. a Intel NUC system with NVMe SS
On 2022-05-05 17:42, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Le jeu. 5 mai 2022, 15:55, Stefan Agner a écrit :
>
>> Despite the UEFI specification saying "the requirement is that the
>> start address of a buffer must be evenly divisible by IoAlign with
>> no remainder.", it seems that a higher a
Le jeu. 5 mai 2022, 15:55, Stefan Agner a écrit :
> Despite the UEFI specification saying "the requirement is that the
> start address of a buffer must be evenly divisible by IoAlign with
> no remainder.", it seems that a higher alignment requirement is
> neecssary on some system (e.g. a Intel NU
