Re: [PATCH] efi: stub out __grub_efi_api when GRUB_UTIL is defined

2025-03-31 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 4:45 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > ms_abi is not a valid attribute on x32 (__x86_64__ && __ILP32__). > This ABI should be unnecessary for utils anyway. > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/927826 > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > --- > include/grub/efi/api.h | 4 > 1 file cha

Re: [PATCH] efi: stub out __grub_efi_api when GRUB_UTIL is defined

2024-12-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 3:20 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 7:57 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 22:46, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > > ms_abi is not a valid attribute on x32 (__x86_64__ && __ILP32__). > > > This ABI should be unnecessary for utils anywa

Re: [PATCH] efi: stub out __grub_efi_api when GRUB_UTIL is defined

2024-12-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 7:57 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 22:46, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > ms_abi is not a valid attribute on x32 (__x86_64__ && __ILP32__). > > This ABI should be unnecessary for utils anyway. > > > > These utils are host tools, right? E.g., grub-install,

Re: [PATCH] efi: stub out __grub_efi_api when GRUB_UTIL is defined

2024-12-01 Thread Ard Biesheuvel via Grub-devel
On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 22:46, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > ms_abi is not a valid attribute on x32 (__x86_64__ && __ILP32__). > This ABI should be unnecessary for utils anyway. > These utils are host tools, right? E.g., grub-install, update-grub, etc running under the OS? Why are those using headers t