On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 04:05:00 +
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, 03:19 Glenn Washburn,
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:18:50 +0100
> > Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > On 11/12/23 04:23, Glenn W
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:18:50 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 11/12/23 04:23, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > The canary, __stack_chk_guard, is in the BSS and so will get initialized
> > > to
> > > zero if it is not explicitly in
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, 03:19 Glenn Washburn,
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:18:50 +0100
> Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 11/12/23 04:23, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > > The canary, __stack_chk_guard, is in the BSS and so will
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:18:50 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 11/12/23 04:23, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > The canary, __stack_chk_guard, is in the BSS and so will get initialized
> > > to
> > > zero if it is not explicitly in
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/12/23 04:23, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > The canary, __stack_chk_guard, is in the BSS and so will get initialized to
> > zero if it is not explicitly initialized. If the UEFI firmware does not
> > support the RNG protocol, t
On 11/12/23 04:23, Glenn Washburn wrote:
The canary, __stack_chk_guard, is in the BSS and so will get initialized to
zero if it is not explicitly initialized. If the UEFI firmware does not
support the RNG protocol, then the canary will not be randomized and will
be used as zero. This seems like a
