On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 21:51 -0400, BandiPat wrote:
> But again, why not put a freeze on adding things, just fix the bugs so
> you can release a stable version number for those squeamish about using svn?
Fine with me. I think GRUB is in a pretty good state now for a release.
Perhaps I would sti
Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 22:20 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
Many "GNU GRUB version 1.96" used in production are likely builds from
more recent SVN snapshots. It would (IMO) be useful to have some info
about the actual installed version.
I can tell from my experience with o
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 22:20 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
>> Many "GNU GRUB version 1.96" used in production are likely builds from
>> more recent SVN snapshots. It would (IMO) be useful to have some info
>> about the actual installed version
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 22:20 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
> Many "GNU GRUB version 1.96" used in production are likely builds from
> more recent SVN snapshots. It would (IMO) be useful to have some info
> about the actual installed version.
I can tell from my experience with other projects tha
