On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:04:39PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> (footnote) We are applying GPL license to these modules, but they'll
> >> never end up in the grub tree. Our requirements are too weird. You
> >> won't want to merge this code, believe me.
> >
> > I understand. Goo
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:20:58PM -0700, Joe Auricchio wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:13, Robert Millan wrote:
>> >
>> > My bad...
>> >
>> > When I proposed adding a framework for building GRUB modules externally, I
>> > was expecting i
>> (footnote) We are applying GPL license to these modules, but they'll
>> never end up in the grub tree. Our requirements are too weird. You
>> won't want to merge this code, believe me.
>
> I understand. Good luck with it!
This case is exactly something external module build want to prevent.
If
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:20:58PM -0700, Joe Auricchio wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:13, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > My bad...
> >
> > When I proposed adding a framework for building GRUB modules externally, I
> > was expecting it would end up being used. I had grub-extras in mind.
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:13, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> My bad...
>
> When I proposed adding a framework for building GRUB modules externally, I
> was expecting it would end up being used. I had grub-extras in mind.
>
> But it became much simpler and straightforwarded to build grub-extras by
> ove
