Re: [PATCH] Reimplement 10_freebsd.in using 10_linux.in

2009-08-19 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:27:51PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> 1) stat and readlink are different. Does anyone have an idea how to > >> make scripts always use right syntax? > > > > AFAIK a custom autoconf snippet is the only way. > I would prefer it to be done on runtime if po

Re: [PATCH] Reimplement 10_freebsd.in using 10_linux.in

2009-08-17 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 09:29:08PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> As discussed on IRC this patch has problems on FreeBSD. >> Among them >> 1) stat and readlink are different. Does anyone have an idea how to >> make scripts alwa

Re: [PATCH] Reimplement 10_freebsd.in using 10_linux.in

2009-08-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 09:29:08PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > As discussed on IRC this patch has problems on FreeBSD. > Among them > 1) stat and readlink are different. Does anyone have an idea how to > make scripts always use right syntax? AFAIK a custom autoconf snippet is the

Re: [PATCH] Reimplement 10_freebsd.in using 10_linux.in

2009-08-16 Thread Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > > This patch reimplements 10_freebsd.in using 10_linux.in as a base, with > the kFreeBSD-specific parts of 10_freebsd.in. > > The new version brings in support for multiple kernel versions (the reason > for the rewrite) and also handling of acp