Bean confirmed it works. Committed without changing jmp to call, since it
wasn't clear whether we want it or not.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:38:48PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> >
> > "exit" in open firmware based systems would probably mean returning
> > control to open firmware.
> >
> > By the way, it would be nice to have "exit" in both grub for PC and
> > grub-emu, and not only in the rescue mode. "exit" on P
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:13 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> > > + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
> >
> > Or maybe that should be a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:16:43AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:13 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> > > + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
> >
> > Or maybe that should be a "call" instead..
>
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 14:13 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> > + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
>
> Or maybe that should be a "call" instead..
Only if there is any chance of return, and we can handle it.
"exit" in op
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 13:32 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >Now that I think of it, is there any reason for doing all the cmain()
> > >cruft before grub_main() ? Getting to grub_ma
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> - jmp EXT_C(cmain)
> + jmp EXT_C(grub_main)
Or maybe that should be a "call" instead..
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Now that I think of it, is there any reason for doing all the cmain()
> >cruft before grub_main() ? Getting to grub_main() only requires a working
> >stack, which we have, and grub_main
Quoting Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Now that I think of it, is there any reason for doing all the cmain()
cruft before grub_main() ? Getting to grub_main() only requires a working
stack, which we have, and grub_main() inmediately returns control back to
architecture-specific code in grub
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:53:21PM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 15:38 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30:40AM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > > diff -rup grub-1.95.orig/kern/main.c grub-1.95/kern/main.c
> > > --- grub-1.95.orig/kern/main.c
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 15:01 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 00:30 +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > These are pretty self-explainable. I think I tried to sumbit these
> > changes with the serial debugging patch year and some months ago and I
> > was told to sign the copyright as
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 15:38 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30:40AM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > diff -rup grub-1.95.orig/kern/main.c grub-1.95/kern/main.c
> > --- grub-1.95.orig/kern/main.c 2007-01-29 15:31:36.0 +0100
> > +++ grub-1.95/kern/main.c 2007
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 00:30 +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> These are pretty self-explainable. I think I tried to sumbit these
> changes with the serial debugging patch year and some months ago and I
> was told to sign the copyright assignment. I have already done that
> now. :)
>
> 2008-04-15 Lu
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30:40AM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> diff -rup grub-1.95.orig/kern/main.c grub-1.95/kern/main.c
> --- grub-1.95.orig/kern/main.c2007-01-29 15:31:36.0 +0100
> +++ grub-1.95/kern/main.c 2007-01-30 18:29:55.0 +0100
> @@ -106,6 +106,14 @@ grub_l
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:30:40AM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> These are pretty self-explainable. I think I tried to sumbit these
> changes with the serial debugging patch year and some months ago and I
> was told to sign the copyright assignment. I have already done that
> now. :)
>
> 2008-04
15 matches
Mail list logo