On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:45:48AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:10:31PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:55:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > If we default to verbose, we could also have an option to turn it off
> > > > from
> > > > /etc/d
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:10:31PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:55:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > If we default to verbose, we could also have an option to turn it off from
> > > /etc/default/grub, if that makes life easier for you.
> >
> > Slightly, I suppose. I
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:55:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > If we default to verbose, we could also have an option to turn it off from
> > /etc/default/grub, if that makes life easier for you.
>
> Slightly, I suppose. I thought there were some feelings against
> excessive numbers of options
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> I'd like to integrate http://grub.enbug.org/Hiddenmenu as a
>> grub-mkconfig option so that we can use it by default in Ubuntu. How
>> does the attached patch look? I dropped the
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:44:50PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'd like to integrate http://grub.enbug.org/Hiddenmenu as a
> > grub-mkconfig option so that we can use it by default in Ubuntu. How
> > does the attached patch look? I
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:38:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'd like to integrate http://grub.enbug.org/Hiddenmenu as a
> grub-mkconfig option so that we can use it by default in Ubuntu. How
> does the attached patch look? I dropped the --verbose from the wiki page
> since I personally prefer i
