On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 13:48, Colin Watson wrote:
> OK. I've committed the patch at the head of this thread, then. Thanks,
> Richard.
Thanks for commiting to legacy :)
Richard
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:31:54PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:14:29AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:01:44AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 09:47, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > Thanks for your patch. However, it ap
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:14:29AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:01:44AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 09:47, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Thanks for your patch. However, it appears to be against GRUB Legacy,
> > > which no longer has an upstream
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:01:44AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 09:47, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Thanks for your patch. However, it appears to be against GRUB Legacy,
> > which no longer has an upstream maintainer. The same typos aren't
> > present in GRUB 2.
>
> Correct,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 09:47, Colin Watson wrote:
> Thanks for your patch. However, it appears to be against GRUB Legacy,
> which no longer has an upstream maintainer. The same typos aren't
> present in GRUB 2.
Correct, GRUB 2 is fine.
Personally, I think it's worth committing to legacy because
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:36:46AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please see attached.
> === modified file 'stage2/builtins.c'
> --- stage2/builtins.c 2006-03-21 20:51:58 +
> +++ stage2/builtins.c 2009-12-02 02:33:13 +
Thanks for your patch. However, it appears to be agains
