Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-07-22 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:14:54PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 14:41 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > > > [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-05/msg9.html > > > > So what's now with it? > > Marco can you at least say something about it? > > It would be

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-07-22 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 14:41 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-05/msg9.html > > So what's now with it? > Marco can you at least say something about it? > It would be very nice if the warnings would be more visible by default. > Probable we ca

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-07-22 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2009, 10:29 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke: > Am Samstag, den 11.04.2009, 19:09 +0900 schrieb Yoshinori K. Okuji: > > On Saturday 11 April 2009 08:25:50 phcoder wrote: > > > I don't see any stoppers to merge this patch > > > > Personally, I don't like this so much. Is it so usef

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-05-03 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Samstag, den 11.04.2009, 19:09 +0900 schrieb Yoshinori K. Okuji: > On Saturday 11 April 2009 08:25:50 phcoder wrote: > > I don't see any stoppers to merge this patch > > Personally, I don't like this so much. Is it so useful? > Okuji can we please have this? Robert brought up again to use -We

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-14 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Monday 13 April 2009 14:03:01 Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 18:07 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Pavel Roskin > > Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:49 -0400 > > > > > On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 08:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: > > >> If we could build with -Werror, then it wouldn't

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 18:07 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Pavel Roskin > Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:49 -0400 > > > On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 08:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: > > > >> If we could build with -Werror, then it wouldn't be so hard to find the > >> warnings since the build woul

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-12 Thread David Miller
From: Pavel Roskin Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:24:49 -0400 > On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 08:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: > >> If we could build with -Werror, then it wouldn't be so hard to find the >> warnings since the build would abort... > > It's also possible to redirect stderr to a file so th

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-12 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 08:29 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: > If we could build with -Werror, then it wouldn't be so hard to find the > warnings since the build would abort... It's also possible to redirect stderr to a file so that the build doesn't stumble on the first warning. I my opinion, mak

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-11 Thread Colin D Bennett
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote on Saturday 11 April 2009: > On Saturday 11 April 2009 08:25:50 phcoder wrote: > > I don't see any stoppers to merge this patch > > Personally, I don't like this so much. Is it so useful? Absolutely. I find it tedious to scroll back through thousands of lines of text ful

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-11 Thread phcoder
The problem is that build system creates a lot of output on progress and so the warnings are often not very visible Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: On Saturday 11 April 2009 08:25:50 phcoder wrote: I don't see any stoppers to merge this patch Personally, I don't like this so much. Is it so useful?

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-11 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Saturday 11 April 2009 08:25:50 phcoder wrote: > I don't see any stoppers to merge this patch Personally, I don't like this so much. Is it so useful? Regards, Okuji > > Javier Martín wrote: > > This patch modifies several files in the build system (mainly common.rmk > > and genmk.rb) to reduc

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-04-10 Thread phcoder
I don't see any stoppers to merge this patch Javier Martín wrote: This patch modifies several files in the build system (mainly common.rmk and genmk.rb) to reduce the general verbosity of the build process to a manageable, semi-informative level. Thus, what currently appears as "gcc" calls, sever

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-01-25 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:23:29 +0100 Javier Martín wrote: > El dom, 25-01-2009 a las 12:34 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen escribió: > > Javier Martín wrote: > > > This patch modifies several files in the build system (mainly common.rmk > > > and genmk.rb) to reduce the general verbosity of the build proc

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-01-25 Thread Javier Martín
El dom, 25-01-2009 a las 12:34 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen escribió: > Javier Martín wrote: > > This patch modifies several files in the build system (mainly common.rmk > > and genmk.rb) to reduce the general verbosity of the build process to a > > manageable, semi-informative level. Thus, what curren

Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement

2009-01-25 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
Javier Martín wrote: > This patch modifies several files in the build system (mainly common.rmk > and genmk.rb) to reduce the general verbosity of the build process to a > manageable, semi-informative level. Thus, what currently appears as > "gcc" calls, several lines long each is turned into lines