Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2014-05-27 Thread jpac...@redhat.com
Anyone interested? The patch is quite short and doesn't break anything. Is there anything I can do to fasten the process of incorporation? Kind regards, -- Jan Pacner ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2014-05-15 Thread jpac...@redhat.com
Hello everybody, any progress on this? I'm waiting for this feature already more than one and half year, but the patch wasn't included yet. Could you please incorporate it to the upstream branch ASAP? Thanks -- Jan Pacner ___ Grub-devel mailing list Gr

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-18 Thread Pete Appleton
Apologies, please ignore previous patch file which had a replacement missed out. Regards, Pete Appleton === modified file 'docs/grub.texi' --- old/docs/grub.texi 2012-07-31 22:18:57 + +++ new/docs/grub.texi 2012-09-18 21:05:03 + @@ -1285,6 +1285,19 @@ the Linux kernel, using a @samp{ro

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-18 Thread Pete Appleton
On 18/09/12 19:42, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 18.09.2012 20:26, Pete Appleton wrote: GRUB_DEVICE_IDENTIFICATION renamed to LINUX_DEVICE_IDENTIFICATION GRUB_DEVICE_LABEL renamed to LINUX_DEVICE_LABEL as also Linux specific GRUB_DEVICE_BOOT_LABEL removed compl

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-18 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 18.09.2012 20:26, Pete Appleton wrote: > GRUB_DEVICE_IDENTIFICATION renamed to LINUX_DEVICE_IDENTIFICATION > GRUB_DEVICE_LABEL renamed to LINUX_DEVICE_LABEL as also Linux specific > GRUB_DEVICE_BOOT_LABEL removed completely as unused (was added > purely for symmetry) > if statem

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-18 Thread Pete Appleton
On 18/09/12 09:54, Vladimir '?-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 16.09.2012 22:51, Pete Appleton wrote: On 16/09/12 18:40, Vladimir '?-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 16.09.2012 18:57, Pete Appleton wrote: Hi all, The file attached is intended to allow a Linux user to easily specify

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-18 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 16.09.2012 22:51, Pete Appleton wrote: > > On 16/09/12 18:40, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> On 16.09.2012 18:57, Pete Appleton wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The file attached is intended to allow a Linux user to easily specify >>> whether GRUB2 should use the traditional devi

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-16 Thread Pete Appleton
On 16/09/12 18:40, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: On 16.09.2012 18:57, Pete Appleton wrote: Hi all, The file attached is intended to allow a Linux user to easily specify whether GRUB2 should use the traditional device path (/dev/sda1) or the filesystem label instead of the defau

Re: [PATCH] Allow user to choose between path or fs-label instead of UUID

2012-09-16 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 16.09.2012 18:57, Pete Appleton wrote: > Hi all, > > The file attached is intended to allow a Linux user to easily specify > whether GRUB2 should use the traditional device path (/dev/sda1) or the > filesystem label instead of the default UUID scheme. This functionality > is currently support