Re: [PATCH] Add support for passing EFI framebuffer into FreeBSD 10.1 and later

2015-01-22 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch which doesn't add to any > existing structs now. Let me know if this is closer to what you had in > mind. > > I don't think this driver is usable on non-EFI FreeBSD yet. They have a > new VT console driver, but I'm not sure their loader does video m

Re: [PATCH] Add support for passing EFI framebuffer into FreeBSD 10.1 and later

2015-01-22 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 02.11.2014 06:44, Kris Moore wrote: > On 10/28/2014 16:32, Kris Moore wrote: >> Got another patch for review today. >> >> This patch adds support for FreeBSD's new VT console driver when booting >> in EFI mode on FreeBSD 10.1 and later. >> >> Please let me know any comments, or things that need

Re: [PATCH] Add support for passing EFI framebuffer into FreeBSD 10.1 and later

2014-12-30 Thread Kris Moore
On 12/07/2014 16:45, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On 28.10.2014 21:32, Kris Moore wrote: >> Got another patch for review today. >> >> This patch adds support for FreeBSD's new VT console driver when booting >> in EFI mode on FreeBSD 10.1 and later. >> >> Please let me know any com

Re: [PATCH] Add support for passing EFI framebuffer into FreeBSD 10.1 and later

2014-12-07 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 28.10.2014 21:32, Kris Moore wrote: > Got another patch for review today. > > This patch adds support for FreeBSD's new VT console driver when booting > in EFI mode on FreeBSD 10.1 and later. > > Please let me know any comments, or things that need addressed to get > this merged in. > > Thank

Re: [PATCH] Add support for passing EFI framebuffer into FreeBSD 10.1 and later

2014-11-01 Thread Kris Moore
On 10/28/2014 16:32, Kris Moore wrote: > Got another patch for review today. > > This patch adds support for FreeBSD's new VT console driver when booting > in EFI mode on FreeBSD 10.1 and later. > > Please let me know any comments, or things that need addressed to get > this merged in. > > Thanks!