Re: [PATCH] 64-bit file sizes in NTFS

2009-09-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:14:53PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:24:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > It probably would, but I don't think anything cares, does it? This data > > structure is purely internal - it isn't read from disk in a way that > > expects structures

Re: [PATCH] 64-bit file sizes in NTFS

2009-09-11 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:24:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:17:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:39:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Index: include/grub/ntfs.h > > > ===

Re: [PATCH] 64-bit file sizes in NTFS

2009-09-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:17:54PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:39:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > Index: include/grub/ntfs.h > > === > > --- include/grub/ntfs.h (revision 2584) > > +++ include/grub/

Re: [PATCH] 64-bit file sizes in NTFS

2009-09-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:39:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Index: include/grub/ntfs.h > === > --- include/grub/ntfs.h (revision 2584) > +++ include/grub/ntfs.h (working copy) > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct grub_fshelp_no