Am Freitag, den 04.12.2009, 13:34 -0800 schrieb David Miller:
> From: Robert Millan
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:58:25 +0100
>
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:03:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks, but I don't feel comfortable enough with bzr yet.
> >>
> >> I had to struggle just to
From: Robert Millan
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:58:25 +0100
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:03:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, but I don't feel comfortable enough with bzr yet.
>>
>> I had to struggle just to get things checked out, as the bzr
>> package in Debian stable is too old to u
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:03:09PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> Thanks, but I don't feel comfortable enough with bzr yet.
>
> I had to struggle just to get things checked out, as the bzr
> package in Debian stable is too old to use to access to repo.
>
> (For the record I disagree with the sou
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:59:00PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> I have about half a year of potential regressions I'm about to
> discover on sparc64. That's not an acceptable situation, long term.
>
> I might get hit by a bus or whatever, so it would be nice if someone
> other than me were at
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:22:27PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> You can commit to bzr yourself actually. And unless Robert objects I
> guess your permission to tangle with sparc parts as you see fit is still
> valid
Of course.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:17:29AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> So I finally am about to have enough time to start looking into
> sparc64 support again.
>
> And, surprise! The trunk doesn't even build. :-)
I guess this one's my fault. Must have left it when adding all those
progname.c, progn
From: Vladimir '$B&U(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:56:34 +0100
> The problem is that nobody of us has such hardware. I would happily do a
> sparc boot every 2 weeks but I just don't have a sparc
You can get an Ultra5 for ~$100.00 USD on EBAY :-)
Anyways, no matter, I'm
David Miller wrote:
> From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0100
>
>
>> For me the main reason for or against it is break probability. Merging
>> will avoid stupid breakages like ones you fixed but may introduce more
>> subtle ones
>>
>
> You lack a
From: Vladimir '$B&U(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0100
> David Miller wrote:
>>> Committed.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> You can commit to bzr yourself actually. And unless Robert objects I
> guess your permission to tangle with sparc parts as you see fit is
From: Vladimir '$B&U(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:22:27 +0100
> For me the main reason for or against it is break probability. Merging
> will avoid stupid breakages like ones you fixed but may introduce more
> subtle ones
You lack a cross-build environment?
I test bui
David Miller wrote:
>> Committed.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
You can commit to bzr yourself actually. And unless Robert objects I
guess your permission to tangle with sparc parts as you see fit is still
valid
>> BTW in experimental we merged sparc64's and i386's grub-install. Do
>> you think it wou
From: Vladimir '$B&U(B-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:26:05 +0100
> Hello, nice to see you again.
> David Miller wrote:
>> So I finally am about to have enough time to start looking into
>> sparc64 support again.
>>
>>
>
>> And, surprise! The trunk doesn't even build.
Hello, nice to see you again.
David Miller wrote:
> So I finally am about to have enough time to start looking into
> sparc64 support again.
>
>
> And, surprise! The trunk doesn't even build. :-)
>
Committed. BTW in experimental we merged sparc64's and i386's
grub-install. Do you think it w
13 matches
Mail list logo
