Robert Millan schrieb:
For 10_linux it isn't that important since the boot parameters are so small,
it's 10_hurd that has more reusable stuff (that big blurb).
This is true. Furthermore I still haven't found out how to get
variables like "host-port", "device-port", "task-create", etc..
In t
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:33:13AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >For this one, I think it'd be much better to rework 10_hurd so that code is
> >shared, rather than duplicating the whole blurb.
>
> Yes, we could source out the complete linux/hurd kernel-adding blurbs
> into an external shell l
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Robert Millan schrieb:
> >Better do this like it's done in other scripts (check grub-install). Not
> >sure
> >why, I guess it's more portable that way...
>
> Ah, now I know what you ment. However, I cannot really see the
> adva
Robert Millan schrieb:
Better do this like it's done in other scripts (check grub-install). Not sure
why, I guess it's more portable that way...
Ah, now I know what you ment. However, I cannot really see the
advantage in
grub_probe=${sbindir}/`echo grub-probe | sed ${transform}`
with ${tr
Robert Millan schrieb:
Better do this like it's done in other scripts (check grub-install). Not sure
why, I guess it's more portable that way...
You mean
if [ "x$(FOO)" = "x" ] ...
?
For this one, I think it'd be much better to rework 10_hurd so that code is
shared, rather than duplicating
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
> if [ -x "`which os-prober 2>/dev/null`" ] ; then
Better do this like it's done in other scripts (check grub-install). Not sure
why, I guess it's more portable that way...
> if [ -x "`which linux-boot-prober 2>/dev/n
Robert Millan schrieb:
Ok. Is there any mail for that waiting for input? I lose track of things.
No problem, please find the script attached.
#! /bin/sh -e
# update-grub helper script.
# Copyright (C) 2006,2007,2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
#
# GRUB is free software: you can redist
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Robert Millan schrieb:
> >Committed.
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> Now let's get support for os-prober output parsing.
Ok. Is there any mail for that waiting for input? I lose track of things.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I
Robert Millan schrieb:
Committed.
Great, thanks!
Now let's get support for os-prober output parsing.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:26:49AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Robert Millan schrieb:
> >Ok. Does anybody object to Fabian's patch? I'd like to commit it.
>
> Silence is consense. ;)
Committed.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you a
Robert Millan schrieb:
Ok. Does anybody object to Fabian's patch? I'd like to commit it.
Silence is consense. ;)
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:49:01AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >If you fix those, include a ChangeLog entry and noone else objects, I'll
> >commit
> >it. Feel free to ping me with a direct mail if I stale for too long.
>
> You are CCed. ;)
>
> Robert Millan schrieb:
> > Is this solved now?
Hello!
Robert Millan schrieb:
It looks good to me. Just a pair of minor details (simply for consistency with
code style in grub):
[...]
done.
If you fix those, include a ChangeLog entry and noone else objects, I'll commit
it. Feel free to ping me with a direct mail if I stale for too long.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:32:02PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> However, grub-probe crashes with a double free error message if run with
> the -d option. I am somehow stuck in this situation, can you please help me?
Is this solved now? If not, you could send a gdb backtrace to give us an id
Sorry for the long delay, I've been very busy (and unfortunately I'll continue
to be :-().
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:36:35PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Well, the solution seems to be easier than I expected. Is the attached
> patch acceptable?
It looks good to me. Just a pair of minor de
Well, the solution seems to be easier than I expected. Is the attached patch
acceptable?
Have a nice weekend,
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49
16 matches
Mail list logo