On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 07:40:35PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
>>
>> Martin, our problem is that "single-user mode" is very confusing for those
>> not experienced with Un*x. They tend to think this is the normal mode of
>> operation since they are (usually) a "single user".
>>
>> Any comments?
Martin
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:07:22AM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
I'd keep it a bit less technical. Something like "rescue mode" or
"recovery mode".
Suggestions?
--
I think either of those may work better. Either better describes the
le
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 09:10:15PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Robert Millan [2009.02.21.2049 +0100]:
> > Martin, our problem is that "single-user mode" is very confusing for those
> > not experienced with Un*x. They tend to think this is the normal mode of
> > operation since the
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:07:22AM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
>> I'd keep it a bit less technical. Something like "rescue mode" or
>> "recovery mode".
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
> --
>
> I think either of those may work better. Either better describes the
> level
Robert Millan wrote:
I'd keep it a bit less technical. Something like "rescue mode" or
"recovery mode".
Suggestions?
--
I think either of those may work better. Either better describes the
level the machine boots to, yet will be less confusing to the user as to
why it's i
