Hi,
Pavel Roskin writes:
> In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly
> added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent.
> That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That's the only
> difference I'm aware of.
>
> Running indent on the co
> In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the
> newly added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of
> GNU indent. That is, the space after "!" should not be needed.
> That's the only difference I'm aware of.
What does GCS say about spaces after "!"
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:37:20PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly
> added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent.
> That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That's the only
> differe
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:01 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> 8) Removed spaces before labels
Oh, I missed that. I think we should follow GNU indent in the label
placement as well.
> it has put { on new line and without spacing
> Perhaps something more. The patch would be 77280 line
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly
> added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent.
I agree with proposition
>
> That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That
Hello!
In order to encourage developers to use proper indentation on the newly
added code, I suggest that we accept the default style of GNU indent.
That is, the space after "!" should not be needed. That's the only
difference I'm aware of.
Running indent on the code and then adding spaces after
