В Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:24:55 +0200
Holger Goetz пишет:
> Hi,
>
> looks i could need some help here.
>
> I've moved the smbios module from commands/i386 to commands and added
> some casts to make the compiler happy. As I need a x86_64-efi grub.
> What i see now is that the "_SM_" signature is no
Hi,
looks i could need some help here.
I've moved the smbios module from commands/i386 to commands and added
some casts to make the compiler happy. As I need a x86_64-efi grub.
What i see now is that the "_SM_" signature is not found: "Failed to
locate entry point structure" some added grub_d
If the module isn't salvageable on UEFI, maybe I can send out an
updated version whenever I upgrade to such a system.
Change to retrieve SMBIOS on EFI is minor. See ACPI for comparison.
___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu
On 19.07.2013 18:31, David Michael wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Holger Goetz wrote:
Yes it's towards the right direction. But it is 32bit only if i understand
correctly, and it basically is a memory access to fixed/hardcoded MEMORY
address (0x8001). to pick the veondor id
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Holger Goetz wrote:
> Yes it's towards the right direction. But it is 32bit only if i understand
> correctly, and it basically is a memory access to fixed/hardcoded MEMORY
> address (0x8001). to pick the veondor id and machine info.
It's true that I've
Hi,
ok posting on grub-devel list now. Further answer(s) at the bottom.
On 18.07.2013 17:35, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I guess further discussion should be really moved to grub-devel
В Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:39:44 +0200
Holger Goetz пишет:
On 17.07.2013 16:31, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Wed, J
