On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 05:00:03PM +0200, Tobias Powalowski via Grub-devel
wrote:
> Probably. If you could share with me a link to the binary/package
> which
> fails I could double check all symbols are in place.
>
> Daniel
> Hi Daniel,
> https://mirror.f4st.host/archlinux/core
Probably. If you could share with me a link to the binary/package which
fails I could double check all symbols are in place.
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
https://mirror.f4st.host/archlinux/core/os/x86_64/grub-2%3A2.06.r591.g6425c12cd-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst
Tobias
--
Tobias Powalowski
Arch Linux Developer
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 04:17:34PM +0200, Tobias Powalowski via Grub-devel
wrote:
> Am 06.07.23 um 15:53 schrieb Daniel Kiper:
> > This and [1] suggest problems with updating the GRUB modules.
> > The grub_is_shim_lock_enabled symbol is provided by the GRUB kernel.
> > If for some reason the GRUB
Am 06.07.23 um 15:53 schrieb Daniel Kiper:
This and [1] suggest problems with updating the GRUB modules.
The grub_is_shim_lock_enabled symbol is provided by the GRUB kernel.
If for some reason the GRUB kernel is downgraded but modules are not
then newer version of the linux.mod tries to call the
Hi here reported by some people:
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/14rlz7x/latest_grub_error
any idea, why this happens?
From the comments section:
---
The actual error message that OP meant to say is |error: symbol
'grub_is_shim_lock_enabled' not found|.
So like a symbol from th
