Re: Nested Function Patches

2006-01-10 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Monday 09 January 2006 07:13 pm, Peter Jones wrote: > There's no FUD here. The grub project *has* chosen to ignore the > implications of this, and you continue to do so. As I said, I don't take your claim serious until you show a good reason. This is not ignoring but rejecting. > This is jus

Re: Nested Function Patches

2006-01-10 Thread Marco Gerards
Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:06 +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: >> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 09:08 am, Peter Jones wrote: >> > That's taking the very unrealistic point of view that using nested >> > functions isn't broken. It is, in a great many ways whi

Re: Nested Function Patches

2006-01-09 Thread Peter Jones
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:06 +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 09:08 am, Peter Jones wrote: > > That's taking the very unrealistic point of view that using nested > > functions isn't broken. It is, in a great many ways which have already > > been discussed in depth, a

Re: Nested Function Patches

2006-01-09 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 09:08 am, Peter Jones wrote: > That's taking the very unrealistic point of view that using nested > functions isn't broken. It is, in a great many ways which have already > been discussed in depth, and which you've, rather disturbingly, chosen > to ignore. Using "fea

Re: Nested Function Patches

2005-12-28 Thread Peter Jones
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:33 +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > Andre Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > As I mentioned before, Apple has disabled nested function support for > > GRUB2. Would the group be willing to accept patches addressing this > > issue? I would like to see GRUB2 on Mac OS X. I

Re: Nested Function Patches

2005-12-23 Thread andre-smith
that I may have caused. Andre > -Original Message- > From: Marco Gerards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 08:33 AM > To: 'The development of GRUB 2' > Subject: Re: Nested Function Patches > > Andre Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Nested Function Patches

2005-12-23 Thread Marco Gerards
Andre Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As I mentioned before, Apple has disabled nested function support for > GRUB2. Would the group be willing to accept patches addressing this > issue? I would like to see GRUB2 on Mac OS X. I do have a very simple > patch for help.c, and I would like continu

Nested Function Patches

2005-12-22 Thread Andre Smith
As I mentioned before, Apple has disabled nested function support for GRUB2. Would the group be willing to accept patches addressing this issue? I would like to see GRUB2 on Mac OS X. I do have a very simple patch for help.c, and I would like continue the work with the groups blessing. _