What's the status of
> >TrustedGRUB? Should the projects be merged? etc. etc.
>
> Yep, Uwe Hermann was in the right about Grub Security Modules destiny :)
> I'll try to describe in a few words their main ideas:
What you describes seems mostly fine to me. However, I&#
o TPMs and stuff? If so, please check
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/trustedgrub
>http://trousers.sourceforge.net/grub.html
>Does the functionality overlap? What's the status of
>TrustedGRUB? Should the projects be merged? etc. etc.
Yep, Uwe Hermann was in the right about Grub Se
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:49:40PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:26:45PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:08:35PM +, Oleg Strikov wrote:
> > > Good Day!
> > > I'm gonna create some grub2 security extensions to make fully functional
> > > High
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:26:45PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:08:35PM +, Oleg Strikov wrote:
> > Good Day!
> > I'm gonna create some grub2 security extensions to make fully functional
> > High
> > Assurance Bootloader. Now a have some pre-alpha code, but it seems
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:08:35PM +, Oleg Strikov wrote:
> Good Day!
> I'm gonna create some grub2 security extensions to make fully functional High
> Assurance Bootloader. Now a have some pre-alpha code, but it seems to be
> functional in short time.
> I'm exporting some code from gnupg (gpl
Good Day!
I'm gonna create some grub2 security extensions to make fully functional High
Assurance Bootloader. Now a have some pre-alpha code, but it seems to be
functional in short time.
I'm exporting some code from gnupg (gpl v.3) project (RSA and MD5 impl). Is
it correct?
Will it be usable for g
