On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Michael Gorven wrote:
> On Monday 18 August 2008 23:23:54 Simon Peter wrote:
> > In the meantime, I've assigned copyright of my work (excluding the AES
> > and RIPEMD implementations) to the FSF. The documents are probably
> > already waiting in my mailbox
Marco, I think you're the only one who can take care of this. Please could
you have a look?
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 05:26:46PM +0200, Simon Peter wrote:
> > >> In the meantime, I've assigned copyright of my work (excluding the
> > >> AES and RIPEMD implementations) to the FSF. The documents are
> >> In the meantime, I've assigned copyright of my work (excluding the
> >> AES and RIPEMD implementations) to the FSF. The documents are
> >> probably already waiting in my mailbox at home. I'll get the
> >> signing done once I'm back home at the end of this month.
> > I assume that I shall need
>> In the meantime, I've assigned copyright of my work (excluding the AES
>> and RIPEMD implementations) to the FSF. The documents are probably
>> already waiting in my mailbox at home. I'll get the signing done once
>> I'm back home at the end of this month.
> I assume that I shall need to do th
On Monday 18 August 2008 23:23:54 Simon Peter wrote:
> In the meantime, I've assigned copyright of my work (excluding the AES
> and RIPEMD implementations) to the FSF. The documents are probably
> already waiting in my mailbox at home. I'll get the signing done once
> I'm back home at the end of th
> > I was about the review Simon's patch. What is the best way to
> > proceed. More than one person works on this and I am confused about
> > how to deal with this. Would it help if Simons work got in first,
> > or didn't you continue with this, but did you just pick pieces of
> > code from him
On Saturday 09 August 2008 17:24:23 Marco Gerards wrote:
> I was about the review Simon's patch. What is the best way to
> proceed. More than one person works on this and I am confused about
> how to deal with this. Would it help if Simons work got in first, or
> didn't you continue with this, b
Hi Michael,
Michael Gorven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Two months ago[1] I announced on this list that I was working on adding
> support for LUKS encrypted partitions to GRUB. I had some queries[2]
> regarding other code which I have used, and still haven't had a proper
> response to those q
Hi
Two months ago[1] I announced on this list that I was working on adding
support for LUKS encrypted partitions to GRUB. I had some queries[2]
regarding other code which I have used, and still haven't had a proper
response to those queries. Could someone please advise me on what needs to be
d
