Re: Changes needed in grub-mkimage for UEFI

2010-06-20 Thread KESHAV P.R.
Thanks. A blank prefix parameter fixed the problem. > On the contrary. Now we use the same defaults on all platforms which > simplifies maintaining and packaging. To get old behaviour add > -p "" > to grub-mkimage line What about this request? Is this feasible? >> I have one more feature request

Re: Changes needed in grub-mkimage for UEFI

2010-06-19 Thread Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
On 06/19/2010 05:42 PM, KESHAV P.R. wrote: > The bzr rev 2372 which unified grub-mkimage command has lead to a > generated grub.efi not being portable. I have to use the following > command to generate a working grub2.efi > > On the contrary. Now we use the same defaults on all platforms which s

Changes needed in grub-mkimage for UEFI

2010-06-19 Thread KESHAV P.R.
The bzr rev 2372 which unified grub-mkimage command has lead to a generated grub.efi not being portable. I have to use the following command to generate a working grub2.efi ./grub-mkimage -d . -o /efi/grub2/grub2.efi -O x86_64-efi -p /efi/grub2 No efi based boot-loader I know of, stores hard-cod