CCing you cause I'm not sure if you're still subscribed.
Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Peter Rajnoha:
>
> OK, I'll try to talk with Kay again and discuss all the problems that
> this "udev law" brings in real-life situations for dm devices and
> everything using it.
>
> I just
On 09/09/2009 12:26 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> What's the point in having the /dev/dm-X devices at all?
> Does anything use them?
...nothing uses them and nothing ever should! These names are not
stable (the number depends on the activation sequence of those
devices). Not usable for anything, real
Am Mittwoch, den 09.09.2009, 12:01 +0200 schrieb Peter Rajnoha:
> Hi,
>
> (I'm speaking for the LVM/DM team)
>
> we have integrated official udev support for device-mapper/LVM
> devices lately which is now part of upstream LVM release (however
> it's still turned off in default configuration). Th
Hi,
(I'm speaking for the LVM/DM team)
we have integrated official udev support for device-mapper/LVM
devices lately which is now part of upstream LVM release (however
it's still turned off in default configuration). This includes
our own udev rules responsible for creating /dev nodes and
associa
