Re: btrfs subvolumes [was Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1] ]

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:22:10AM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 11, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Olaf Hering > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder'

btrfs subvolumes [was Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1] ]

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Olaf Hering > > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > >> Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of >> bugs >> that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with >> plan_release_id >> set to 2.02. >> > > [snip] > > I would l

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2016, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > .snip.. > > What about > > > > - disk IO buffer alignment for small read (I personally prefer the first > > version of Leif's patch that exposes alignment in core, it also allows > > us to print it in ls output) > > > > - F2FS support > >

Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

s where static analyzer is confused by checking for > grub_errno. > > > [PATCH 2/2] arm efi: Use fdt from firmware when available > > [PATCH 1/3] push/pop errno in initrd read file path > > [PATCH 3/3] pxenet: process transmit interrupts when out of resources > > Fedor

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Fri, Mar 11, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one > week > > time, so that we can have a reasonable tim

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id set to 2.02. [snip] I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one week time, so t

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:59:03AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > ..snip.. > > What about > > > > - disk IO buffer alignment for small read (I personally prefer the first > > version of Leif's patch that exposes alignment in core, it also allows > > us to print it in ls output) > > > > - F

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

n-standard build options; it needs some discussion how to solve it generically - there are many places where static analyzer is confused by checking for grub_errno. > [PATCH 2/2] arm efi: Use fdt from firmware when available > [PATCH 1/3] push/pop errno in initrd read file path > [PATCH 3/3] pxe

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Sorry, for delay. We have a busy period at work but it should end soon. I've put up the list of tasks for 2.02 in a doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O6wveo1_WsAyEHMD041xMYvhDTDp3jQYzmqkgBx57HM/edit?usp=sharing . If some of them turn out too much work or too tricky, they can still be removed

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:38:32AM -0700, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Can somebody prepare a patch for this minimally changing current linux.c? Sure, I can do that - sorry for the delay here, I had some family things come up and had to spend last week away. So it'll still be a bit long

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Can somebody prepare a patch for this minimally changing current linux.c? On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar, at 04:51:52PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> >> I'm ok with switching to EFI entry point for EFI platforms if plain 32-bit >> entry point stay

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Fri, 11 Mar, at 04:51:52PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > I'm ok with switching to EFI entry point for EFI platforms if plain 32-bit > entry point stays available for platforms like coreboot. Can we agree on > this? Yes, the legacy 32-bit entry points won't be going anywhere. They w

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

02.03.2016 18:01, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > > Please bring up any tasks that needs to be done in your opinion for 2.02 > and not mentioned as separate thread with [2.02] in subject line. > There were several coverity defects that had been marked as "Fix submitted" by you quite some

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

09.03.2016 00:47, Peter Jones пишет: >>> > e704140 Move bash completion script (#922997) Well, this is obvious compatibility question. Is there any way to detect it at configure time? Does bash have pkg-config or similar? >>> >>> I don't see anything obviously like that, unfortun

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

08.03.2016 00:10, Peter Jones пишет: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:33:52PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: >>> I would also appreciate if distros would tell which patches they would >>> carry if 2.02 was released as it is now. If

Fedora patches [was Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]]

On Friday, March 4, 2016, Peter Jones wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > wrote: > > Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of > bugs > > that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with > plan_release_id > > s

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one > week time, > > so that we can have a reasonable timeline > > Did anyone took the time to fix btrfs support (convert i

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On 11/03/16 16:47, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Daniel Kiper > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > would it be possible to get "grub-xen: sup

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Monday, March 7, 2016, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar, at 04:20:00PM, Peter Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > > > > > How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just > > > > changing Linux boot protocol doesn't need FSF involvemen

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wednesday, March 9, 2016, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > would it be possible to get "grub-xen: support booting huge pv-domains" > > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2016-03/msg00071.html) > > patch ser

Re: Linux loader EFI handover (was: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1])

On Wed, 09 Mar, at 11:15:16PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 09.03.2016 18:18, Matt Fleming пишет: > > On Tue, 08 Mar, at 07:57:35AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > - 64-bit kernel on 32-bit platform like Baytrail can't work > >> > >> Do you mean "32 bit EFI"? If yes, why is it a problem? > > > > The

Linux loader EFI handover (was: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1])

09.03.2016 18:18, Matt Fleming пишет: > On Tue, 08 Mar, at 07:57:35AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: - 64-bit kernel on 32-bit platform like Baytrail can't work >> >> Do you mean "32 bit EFI"? If yes, why is it a problem? > > The biggest issue is that there's no way right now for a boot loader > to

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:51:42PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > I will go through most of my mails tomorrow. I'm inclined to include > multiboot2 extensions but had few comments about patch style No problem. Thanks a lot! Daniel ___ Gr

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Tue, 08 Mar, at 07:57:35AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > >> - 64-bit kernel on 32-bit platform like Baytrail can't work > > Do you mean "32 bit EFI"? If yes, why is it a problem? The biggest issue is that there's no way right now for a boot loader to tell the kernel that it needs to use a transla

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

I will go through most of my mails tomorrow. I'm inclined to include multiboot2 extensions but had few comments about patch style Le mer. 9 mars 2016 15:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:24:49PM +010

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > would it be possible to get "grub-xen: support booting huge pv-domains" > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2016-03/msg00071.html) > patch series into grub2 2.02? Andrei, Vladimir, what do you think about

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:24:49PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs > > that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with pla

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Michael Chang wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> >> > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one week >> > time, >> > so that we can have a reas

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one week > > time, > > so that we can have a reasonable timeline > > Did anyone took the time to fix btrfs su

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wed, Mar 02, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > I would like to come up with a complete list of 2.02 blockers in one week > time, > so that we can have a reasonable timeline Did anyone took the time to fix btrfs support (convert it from handling btrfs as filesystem into that what it reall

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:57:16PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 07.03.2016 22:00, Peter Jones пишет: > ... > > > >>> And these are hardware specific. They're not critical, in the sense > >>> that I can keep carrying them if you have any problems and we can work > >>> it out for the /next/ rel

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

07.03.2016 22:00, Peter Jones пишет: ... > >>> And these are hardware specific. They're not critical, in the sense >>> that I can keep carrying them if you have any problems and we can work >>> it out for the /next/ release. >>> >>> beee9fc Add vlan-tag support on IBM PPC machines >> >> Yes, open

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

08.03.2016 06:40, Michael Chang пишет: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:01:33PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:29:14AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >>> 08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > >> How

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:07:58PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Le lun. 7 mars 2016 23:01, Peter Jones a écrit : > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:29:14AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > 08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: > > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, An

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:01:33PM -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:29:14AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > 08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > >> > > >>> How big part of it is related to secure bo

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, 07 Mar, at 04:20:00PM, Peter Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > > > How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just > > > changing Linux boot protocol doesn't need FSF involvement. Accepting > > > secure > > > > Patches currently use

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Le lun. 7 mars 2016 23:01, Peter Jones a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:29:14AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > 08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > >> > > >>> How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just >

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:29:14AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > >> > >>> How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just > >>> changing Linux boot protocol doesn't need FSF involvemen

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Le lun. 7 mars 2016 22:14, Peter Jones a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:40:58PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > wrote: > > Le lun. 7 mars 2016 21:33, Andrei Borzenkov a > écrit : > > > > > 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > > > >> > > > > I would also appre

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

08.03.2016 00:20, Peter Jones пишет: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> >>> How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just >>> changing Linux boot protocol doesn't need FSF involvement. Accepting secure >> >> Patches currently use EFI stub to launch kernel bu

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 12:08:22AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 08.03.2016 00:03, Peter Jones пишет: > > > I'm curious as to why you think "linux16" doesn't work for Linux, > > though. We use it 100% of the time in Fedora and RHEL, and upstream x86 > > kernel maintainers have expressed a pref

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:57:33PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > > How big part of it is related to secure boot? Just > > changing Linux boot protocol doesn't need FSF involvement. Accepting secure > > Patches currently use EFI stub to launch kernel but I think this is done > simply to make

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:40:58PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Le lun. 7 mars 2016 21:33, Andrei Borzenkov a écrit : > > > 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > > >> > > > I would also appreciate if distros would tell which patches they > > would > > >

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:33:52PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > >> > > I would also appreciate if distros would tell which patches they would > > carry if 2.02 was released as it is now. If some patches are in more > >> than 1 > >

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Le lun. 7 mars 2016 22:03, Peter Jones a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:57:21PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > wrote: > > > > > Well, I have a bunch of patches that need to be clean up (or even > > > > > re-examined), and I've also got the secure-boot branch here: > > > > > > > > >

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

08.03.2016 00:03, Peter Jones пишет: > I'm curious as to why you think "linux16" doesn't work for Linux, > though. We use it 100% of the time in Fedora and RHEL, and upstream x86 > kernel maintainers have expressed a preference for it. Using "linux" > instead seems to break much more, for exampl

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Le lun. 7 mars 2016 21:57, Andrei Borzenkov a écrit : > 07.03.2016 23:40, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > > Le lun. 7 mars 2016 21:33, Andrei Borzenkov a > écrit : > > > >> 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > > >>> I would also appreciate if distros would tel

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:57:21PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > > Well, I have a bunch of patches that need to be clean up (or even > > > > re-examined), and I've also got the secure-boot branch here: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/vathpela/grub2-fedora/tree/sb > > > > > >

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

07.03.2016 23:40, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > Le lun. 7 mars 2016 21:33, Andrei Borzenkov a écrit : > >> 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: >>> I would also appreciate if distros would tell which patches they >> would >>> carry if 2.02 was released as i

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Le lun. 7 mars 2016 21:33, Andrei Borzenkov a écrit : > 07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: > >> > > I would also appreciate if distros would tell which patches they > would > > carry if 2.02 was released as it is now. If some patches are in more > >> than 1 > > dis

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

07.03.2016 22:57, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko пишет: >> > I would also appreciate if distros would tell which patches they would > carry if 2.02 was released as it is now. If some patches are in more >> than 1 > distro we probably need to look into including them. Well, I ha

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Le lun. 7 mars 2016 20:00, Peter Jones a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:38:00AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > 04.03.2016 23:06, Peter Jones пишет: > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' > Serbinenko wrote: > > >> Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs a

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 11:38:00AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 04.03.2016 23:06, Peter Jones пишет: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > > wrote: > >> Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs > >> that need to be look

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

04.03.2016 23:06, Peter Jones пишет: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs >> that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id >> set to 2.02. >> Stat

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs > that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id > set to 2.02. > Statistics: [1] > Search (with loads of false p

Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Hi Vladimir, would it be possible to get "grub-xen: support booting huge pv-domains" (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2016-03/msg00071.html) patch series into grub2 2.02? Juergen ___ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists

Re: Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Hey, On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:01:03PM +, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs > that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id > set to 2.02. > Statistics: [1] > Search (with loads of f

Bugs and tasks for 2.02[~rc1]

Hello, all. I went through the list of bugs and created a shortlist of bugs that need to be looked at for 2.02. I have marked them with plan_release_id set to 2.02. Statistics: [1] Search (with loads of false positives unfortunately): [2] Not every bug there is a release blocker, for some of them i