Brendan Trotter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
>
>> Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>
No. Usuable means only that firmware isn't destroyed. Any device may
be in a different state
>>> Any device (that the firmware as
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>> No. Usuable means only that firmware isn't destroyed. Any device may
>>> be in a different state
>>
>> Any device (that the firmware assumes is in a certain state) may be
>> left in a different
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Anyhow, my priority for GRUB is strong driver-based support. We could
> > recruit
> > someone to develop the framework in next year's GSoC (unless somebody steps
> > in, of cours
Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> No. Usuable means only that firmware isn't destroyed. Any device may
>> be in a different state
>>
>
> Any device (that the firmware assumes is in a certain state) may be
> left in a different state (that the firmware no longer knows about)?
>
> For a very simple exam
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Brendan Trotter
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930,
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:26:55AM +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> An OS could choose to use the information provided by GRUB, or choose
>> to ignore the information provided by GRUB.
>
> Sure, but the less code that needs to go in the b
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:26:55AM +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> An OS could choose to use the information provided by GRUB, or choose
> to ignore the information provided by GRUB.
Sure, but the less code that needs to go in the boot loader the better.
> Assuming GRUB implements something that
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> I don't have relevant experience regarding multiboot in general, but ...
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:53:12AM +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> The same would apply to internationalization - GRUB should tell the OS
>> which language/loca
I don't have relevant experience regarding multiboot in general, but ...
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:53:12AM +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> The same would apply to internationalization - GRUB should tell the OS
> which language/locale it used, so that the OS can automatically use
> the same langua
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>> We are already doing it. There is funct
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> > Well, you have the freedom to disagree
2009/9/14 Brendan Trotter :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> > Well, you have the freedom to disagree with anything we do and bring
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > Well, you have the freedom to disagree with anything we do and bring your
>> > customized GRUB to a differe
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 04:27 +0930, Brendan Trotter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Well, you have the freedom to disagree with anything we do and bring your
> > customized GRUB to a different direction :-)
> >
> > Anyhow, my priority for GRUB is strong d
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> Well, you have the freedom to disagree with anything we do and bring your
> customized GRUB to a different direction :-)
>
> Anyhow, my priority for GRUB is strong driver-based support. We could recruit
> someone to develop the framewor
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 01:54:33PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>
>
> Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Sat, 12 Sep 2009:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:07:10PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>>>
>>> I strongly disagree with you in this specific case. Our experience in
>>> Solaris h
Quoting Robert Millan, who wrote the following on Sat, 12 Sep 2009:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:07:10PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
I strongly disagree with you in this specific case. Our experience in
Solaris has demonstrated that PXE firmware is surprisingly robust (when
the right combin
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:07:10PM -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>
> I strongly disagree with you in this specific case. Our experience in
> Solaris has demonstrated that PXE firmware is surprisingly robust (when
> the right combination of API calls (i.e. those tested by Windows) are
> used).
19 matches
Mail list logo
