Am Samstag, den 01.08.2009, 06:05 -0400 schrieb Alfred M. Szmidt:
> Uhm I thought this wasn't needed because the actual code didn't
>change. But okay GCS talks about all changes made to source files
>so you're probable right.
>
> Usually, such changes do not need to be mentioned in the Ch
Uhm I thought this wasn't needed because the actual code didn't
change. But okay GCS talks about all changes made to source files
so you're probable right.
Usually, such changes do not need to be mentioned in the ChangeLog,
since they do not change the behaviour of anything. The same go
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:02:16PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> Ok thanks to grep and sed
The way of a true hacker. :-)
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > But there was no ChangeLog entry?
> >
>
> Uhm I thought this wasn't needed because the actual code didn't
> change.
> But okay GCS talks about all changes made to source files so you're
> probable right.
>
Ok thanks to grep and
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:09:11PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 20:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:04:56PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:09:11PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 20:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:04:56PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 21:53 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> > > > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:25
Am Dienstag, den 28.07.2009, 20:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:04:56PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 21:53 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> > > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:25 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:04:56PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 21:53 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> > On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:25 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|wc -l
> > > 2273
> > > f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgr
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 21:53 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:25 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|wc -l
> > 2273
> > f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|sed -e
> > 's/:.*//'|uniq|wc -l
> > 170
> >
>
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 21:59 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> By the way, our style is slightly different from that used by GNU
> indent. GRUB uses space after "!", whereas GNU indent doesn't. Also,
> some GRUB sources use one space before labels, and GNU indent starts
> labels from the first c
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 03:48 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> As was discussed on IRC and confirmed by looking at GCS it doesn't
> specify explicitely whether empty lines whould contain spaces. We can
> use either way as long as we use it consistently. I haven't yet found
> how to inst
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 12:25 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|wc -l
> 2273
> f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|sed -e
> 's/:.*//'|uniq|wc -l
> 170
>
> Anyone wants me to do
> find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i -r -e 's/^
Hello
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 12:25 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
>> f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|wc -l
>> 2273
>> f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|sed -e
>> 's/:.*//'|uniq|wc -l
>> 170
>
> See
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2009, 12:25 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|wc -l
> 2273
> f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|sed -e
> 's/:.*//'|uniq|wc -l
> 170
Seems like the regexp isn't clear for everyone, at least Vladimir.
This m
f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|wc -l
2273
f...@fz:~/grub/grub2.git$ rgrep -E "^[[:blank:]]+$" *|sed -e 's/:.*//'|uniq|wc
-l
170
Anyone wants me to do
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i -r -e 's/^[[:blank:]]+$//'
or does someone object?
[:blank:] doestn't contain thes
15 matches
Mail list logo
