Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-29 Thread Felix Zielcke
Commited. Now we only have to think about our Debian package :) Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:54 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:0

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > > * util/update-grub_lib.in: Make it a stub to `grub-mkconfigig_lib.in'. > > > > Typo (mkconfigi

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-24 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > * util/update-grub_lib.in: Make it a stub to `grub-mkconfigig_lib.in'. > > Typo (mkconfigig). Oh thanks for spotting this. Seems like my concentration isn't tha

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > * util/update-grub_lib.in: Make it a stub to `grub-mkconfigig_lib.in'. Typo (mkconfigig). > -y) > echo "$0: warning: Ignoring -y option (no longer needed)." >&2 This option was for compatibility with Debian's up

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-24 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 11:49 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:24:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Index: util/update-grub_lib.in > > === > > --- util/update-grub_lib.in (revision 1863) > > +++ util/up

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-24 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:24:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Index: util/update-grub_lib.in > === > --- util/update-grub_lib.in (revision 1863) > +++ util/update-grub_lib.in (working copy) > @@ -1,173 +0,0 @@ > -# Helper librar

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-17 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 17.09.2008, 17:31 +0300 schrieb Vesa Jääskeläinen: > > Well... grub-mkconfig then ? > > Why not '-o' for consistency with grub-mk*image ? > > That is fine for me. Attached patch is now with grub-mkconfig and an -o or --output option. 008-09-17 Felix Zielcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-17 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: >> Felix Zielcke wrote: >>> Attached is now a patch which renames it to grub-mkconf and prints it to >>> stdout instead of grub.cfg file. >>> I kept the Found kernel/initrd etc. stuff to stderr, but maybe this

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-17 Thread Robert Millan
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > Felix Zielcke wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > >> Since we're going for a change, why not fix the CLI while at it? > >> > >> It'd be much more flexible and consistent if the command wa

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-15 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: >> Since we're going for a change, why not fix the CLI while at it? >> >> It'd be much more flexible and consistent if the command was meant to >> *generate* a grub.cfg rather than update the canonical /boot/gr

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-15 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > Since we're going for a change, why not fix the CLI while at it? > > It'd be much more flexible and consistent if the command was meant to > *generate* a grub.cfg rather than update the canonical /boot/grub/grub.cfg. > Attach

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:50:19PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > > I have now read over the old thread, I was just too lazy first and it > was half a year old anyway. > Okuji suggested grub-update-config too. > > Personally as a user I would still prefer update-grub* and even > install-grub > Bec

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-04 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 20:38 +0300 schrieb Vesa Jääskeläinen: > > If you are going to rename it, please use a name starting with "grub", > > not with "update". Debian is free to provide a wrapper starting with > > "update". > > How about grub-update-config ? I have now read over the old

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-04 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:22 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: >> There was already the topic to rename update-grub to grub-update[0] >> >> On Debian such things are always called update-something not >> something-update[1] >> >> I just told again in a Debian Bugreport to use grub-in

Re: [RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-04 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:22 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > There was already the topic to rename update-grub to grub-update[0] > > On Debian such things are always called update-something not > something-update[1] > > I just told again in a Debian Bugreport to use grub-install to update > grub in

[RFC] rename update-grub to update-grubcfg

2008-09-04 Thread Felix Zielcke
There was already the topic to rename update-grub to grub-update[0] On Debian such things are always called update-something not something-update[1] I just told again in a Debian Bugreport to use grub-install to update grub in real. So I suggest to rename update-grub to something like update-gru