Commited.
Now we only have to think about our Debian package :)
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:54 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:0
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > * util/update-grub_lib.in: Make it a stub to `grub-mkconfigig_lib.in'.
> >
> > Typo (mkconfigi
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > * util/update-grub_lib.in: Make it a stub to `grub-mkconfigig_lib.in'.
>
> Typo (mkconfigig).
Oh thanks for spotting this. Seems like my concentration isn't tha
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 01:04:03PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> * util/update-grub_lib.in: Make it a stub to `grub-mkconfigig_lib.in'.
Typo (mkconfigig).
> -y)
> echo "$0: warning: Ignoring -y option (no longer needed)." >&2
This option was for compatibility with Debian's up
Am Mittwoch, den 24.09.2008, 11:49 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:24:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Index: util/update-grub_lib.in
> > ===
> > --- util/update-grub_lib.in (revision 1863)
> > +++ util/up
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:24:00PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Index: util/update-grub_lib.in
> ===
> --- util/update-grub_lib.in (revision 1863)
> +++ util/update-grub_lib.in (working copy)
> @@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
> -# Helper librar
Am Mittwoch, den 17.09.2008, 17:31 +0300 schrieb Vesa Jääskeläinen:
>
> Well... grub-mkconfig then ?
> > Why not '-o' for consistency with grub-mk*image ?
>
> That is fine for me.
Attached patch is now with grub-mkconfig and an -o or --output option.
008-09-17 Felix Zielcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>> Felix Zielcke wrote:
>>> Attached is now a patch which renames it to grub-mkconf and prints it to
>>> stdout instead of grub.cfg file.
>>> I kept the Found kernel/initrd etc. stuff to stderr, but maybe this
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:14:03PM +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> >> Since we're going for a change, why not fix the CLI while at it?
> >>
> >> It'd be much more flexible and consistent if the command wa
Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
>> Since we're going for a change, why not fix the CLI while at it?
>>
>> It'd be much more flexible and consistent if the command was meant to
>> *generate* a grub.cfg rather than update the canonical /boot/gr
Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
>
> Since we're going for a change, why not fix the CLI while at it?
>
> It'd be much more flexible and consistent if the command was meant to
> *generate* a grub.cfg rather than update the canonical /boot/grub/grub.cfg.
>
Attach
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 07:50:19PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
> I have now read over the old thread, I was just too lazy first and it
> was half a year old anyway.
> Okuji suggested grub-update-config too.
>
> Personally as a user I would still prefer update-grub* and even
> install-grub
> Bec
Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 20:38 +0300 schrieb Vesa Jääskeläinen:
> > If you are going to rename it, please use a name starting with "grub",
> > not with "update". Debian is free to provide a wrapper starting with
> > "update".
>
> How about grub-update-config ?
I have now read over the old
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:22 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>> There was already the topic to rename update-grub to grub-update[0]
>>
>> On Debian such things are always called update-something not
>> something-update[1]
>>
>> I just told again in a Debian Bugreport to use grub-in
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 14:22 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> There was already the topic to rename update-grub to grub-update[0]
>
> On Debian such things are always called update-something not
> something-update[1]
>
> I just told again in a Debian Bugreport to use grub-install to update
> grub in
There was already the topic to rename update-grub to grub-update[0]
On Debian such things are always called update-something not
something-update[1]
I just told again in a Debian Bugreport to use grub-install to update
grub in real.
So I suggest to rename update-grub to something like update-gru
16 matches
Mail list logo
