Robert Millan, le Tue 24 Nov 2009 12:48:22 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:34:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > You're right. We should have documented this better. Perhaps by mentioning
> > it in NEWS and in the release announcement. Sorry about that.
>
> And in spite of that,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:34:37PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> You're right. We should have documented this better. Perhaps by mentioning
> it in NEWS and in the release announcement. Sorry about that.
And in spite of that, both versions comply with the letter of the Multiboot
specificatio
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:20:09PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > Committed with improvements as ACK'ed by Robert on IRC
>
> I wasted at least half of a working day due to this change! (As well as
> ot
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:20:09PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Committed with improvements as ACK'ed by Robert on IRC
I wasted at least half of a working day due to this change! (As well as
others wasted time, who where trying to help me.)
Don't get me wrong -- in princ
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:55:21PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/8/27 Seth Goldberg :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any chance of having a 'multiboot1' module that can continue to pass the
> > multiboot filename as arg0 ?
> >
>
> >From the previous discussion of this feature I guess you can pass it
> as
2009/8/27 Seth Goldberg :
> Hi,
>
> Any chance of having a 'multiboot1' module that can continue to pass the
> multiboot filename as arg0 ?
>
>From the previous discussion of this feature I guess you can pass it
as the first argument manually.
HTH
Michal
__
Hi,
Any chance of having a 'multiboot1' module that can continue to pass the
multiboot filename as arg0 ?
--S
Quoting Seth Goldberg, who wrote the following on Wed, 26 Aug 2009:
Hi there,
Sorry for the delay, but I just discovered this broke booting of Solaris,
and here's why: Solari
Hi there,
Sorry for the delay, but I just discovered this broke booting of Solaris,
and here's why: Solaris depends on knowing the name of the kernel file booted
so it can locate the file within the boot archive (so that the kernel runtime
linker can perform its relocations). Is there any
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 11:42:43PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> >> No. Now we have an extra element that is always present and we want to
>> >> remove but when we remove command line can be empty and code must
>> >> handle it
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 11:42:43PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> No. Now we have an extra element that is always present and we want to
> >> remove but when we remove command line can be empty and code must
> >> handle it correctly.
> >
> > Please try this patch.
> I haven't trie
>> No. Now we have an extra element that is always present and we want to
>> remove but when we remove command line can be empty and code must
>> handle it correctly.
>
> Please try this patch.
I haven't tried it because I know it will fail if someone does
multiboot /payload
Then cmdline_argc = 0;
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:13:27PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >> > There's a much simpler way to address this. Just add something like:
> >> >
> >> > cmdline_argv = argv + 1;
> >> > cmdline_argc = argc - 1;
> >> >
> >> > at the beginning, and then use cmdline_argv and cmdline_
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:37:40PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>> > I agree with this. But please wait a few days to give everyone a chance
>> > to read it.
>> >
>> > Regarding the patch:
>> >
>> > There's a much simpler way to
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:37:40PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > I agree with this. But please wait a few days to give everyone a chance
> > to read it.
> >
> > Regarding the patch:
> >
> > There's a much simpler way to address this. Just add something like:
> >
> > cmdline_arg
> I agree with this. But please wait a few days to give everyone a chance
> to read it.
>
> Regarding the patch:
>
> There's a much simpler way to address this. Just add something like:
>
> cmdline_argv = argv + 1;
> cmdline_argc = argc - 1;
>
> at the beginning, and then use cmdline_argv and c
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 03:23:04PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> According to multiboot specification "It should be possible to write
> compliant boot loaders that load the OS image from a variety of
> sources, including floppy disk, hard disk, and across a network. "
> It implicitl
According to multiboot specification "It should be possible to write
compliant boot loaders that load the OS image from a variety of
sources, including floppy disk, hard disk, and across a network. "
It implicitly says that kernel shouldn't care about filename used by
bootloader. About commandline
17 matches
Mail list logo
