On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:37:12PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2008, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 17:06 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> >
> > > I'm fine with this, but it would be great to hear from Okuji, since he
> > > is making the re
Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2008, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 17:06 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>
> > I'm fine with this, but it would be great to hear from Okuji, since he
> > is making the releases.
>
> Yes, again something both maintainers should look at. But if
Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2008, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 17:06 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>
> > I'm fine with this, but it would be great to hear from Okuji, since he
> > is making the releases.
>
> Yes, again something both maintainers should look at. But if
Am Mittwoch, den 10.09.2008, 17:06 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> I'm fine with this, but it would be great to hear from Okuji, since he
> is making the releases.
Yes, again something both maintainers should look at. But if I
understood Marco correctly then he actually wants to make the 1.97
relea
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:09 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Ok Marco said now on IRC that depending on SVN is okay.
> So attached patch is my proposal.
I'm fine with this, but it would be great to hear from Okuji, since he
is making the releases.
Maybe it would be better to specify svn root in svn
Am Dienstag, den 09.09.2008, 00:32 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:30AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > There seems to be now a increased git interest floating around ;)
>
> Gah, no that was just me porting a program to Multiboot, which happened to
> be hosted on git ;
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:02:30AM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> There seems to be now a increased git interest floating around ;)
Gah, no that was just me porting a program to Multiboot, which happened to
be hosted on git ;-)
> So I think just ditching the old method completely and just dependin
Am Donnerstag, den 04.09.2008, 20:21 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> I think also that the SVN approach would be the better one.
> Shouldn't be too hard to replace that `make
> dist'/DISTLIST/gendistlist.sh stuff with a small script which uses SVN
> for this.
I played now a bit with `git-svn' and
Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2008, 07:30 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> If I was releasing GRUB, I would avoid using DISTLIST even temporarily.
> I would use a separate script for making releases that would:
>
> 1) call "svn export" to create a clean tree
> 2) create generated files
> 3) remove non-dist
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:21 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2008, 13:12 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> > Attached is now a patch which adds ./gendistlist.sh call to autogen.sh
> > and uses SVN in case it is avaible to generate it.
> >
> Ok it's better to look at the patches be
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:12 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 22:11 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>
> >
> > svn ls -R | sed '/\/$/d' | sort > DISTLIST2
>
> Thanks for the regexp.
> The sort is actual not needed, `svn' does this and it places even the
> files with a capital
Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2008, 13:12 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> Attached is now a patch which adds ./gendistlist.sh call to autogen.sh
> and uses SVN in case it is avaible to generate it.
>
Ok it's better to look at the patches before sending them.
+if test -d .svn ; then
+ svn ls -R | sed '/\
Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 22:11 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>
> svn ls -R | sed '/\/$/d' | sort > DISTLIST2
Thanks for the regexp.
The sort is actual not needed, `svn' does this and it places even the
files with a capital letter above everything else just like
gendistlist.sh.
> > This seems t
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 11:28 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 29.08.2008, 19:03 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>
> > Maybe we could take an approach based on the version control system?
> > The distributed files are those under version control plus generated
> > distributed files (if any)
Am Freitag, den 29.08.2008, 19:03 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
> Maybe we could take an approach based on the version control system?
> The distributed files are those under version control plus generated
> distributed files (if any) minus maintainer-only files. The file lists
> for inclusion and
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:54 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
>
> > I don't have almost no opion at all how this should be changed.
> > For me, the first solution to this problem that appears is just removing
> > DISTLIST but that doestn't
Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> I don't have almost no opion at all how this should be changed.
> For me, the first solution to this problem that appears is just removing
> DISTLIST but that doestn't mean of course that it's the best :)
I tend now more to Robert'
Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 14:58 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> >
> > Robert has already noted on IRC to me that the file DISTLIST shouldn't
> > be on SVN
>
> I think I said that its auto-generation should be integrated with autogen.sh,
> so that it's not forgotten. I don't have an opinion on h
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:08:44PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as can be seen on the ChangeLog I cared about the DISTLIST file and the
> gendistlist.sh which should be normally used to create it.
>
> Robert has already noted on IRC to me that the file DISTLIST shouldn't
> be on SVN
Hello,
as can be seen on the ChangeLog I cared about the DISTLIST file and the
gendistlist.sh which should be normally used to create it.
Robert has already noted on IRC to me that the file DISTLIST shouldn't
be on SVN
`make dist' does indeed use the gendistlist.sh already to create
DISTLIST, bu
20 matches
Mail list logo
