Unfortunately I haven't had a lot of time to work with GRUB2. I'll have
some more when my holidays begin in mid October.
Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
>I'd like to see a kind of "design document", since it is a bit hard for others
>to understand.
>
>
Ok. I send one with this mail. Perhaps it wo
Marco Gerards wrote:
>
>Can't this be done in the same bison parser? Or what do you mean?
>
>
I don't think so. Even the tokenization is very differetn. Ex:
2+3*5 is one token for normal parsing, but five for arithmethic
and yylex knows nothing about what parsing is now. If it would always
issu
Vladimir Serbinenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wrote the preciew version of scripting engine. I'll add some comments
> soonly.
> Parser parses everytime one command because the commands could be
> entered from
> commandline. Bison converts in kind of pseudocode. Arithmethic support
> will be
>I'd like to see a kind of "design document", since it is a bit hard for others
>to understand.
>
>
Ok. I hope to write it this week (my studies begin tomorrow)
>
>We must wait until your assignment is finished. How is it going?
>
>
>
>
No problem. I meant after assignment. I sent it back to
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 11:36, Vladimir Serbinenko wrote:
> I wrote the preciew version of scripting engine. I'll add some comments
> soonly.
I'd like to see a kind of "design document", since it is a bit hard for others
to understand.
> It would be good if then it
> could be incorporated
>
I wrote the preciew version of scripting engine. I'll add some comments
soonly.
Parser parses everytime one command because the commands could be
entered from
commandline. Bison converts in kind of pseudocode. Arithmethic support
will be done
by separate parser because arithmetic parse is very diff
