On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 04:15:47PM +0800, Gary Lin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 05:28:20AM +0300, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > I would suggest something a bit more descriptive than if 0. What about
> > #ifdef GRUB_SKIPPED_IMPORTING ?
> >
> That makes sense and improves the readabil
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 05:28:20AM +0300, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I would suggest something a bit more descriptive than if 0. What about
> #ifdef GRUB_SKIPPED_IMPORTING ?
>
That makes sense and improves the readability. Will update it for v9.
Thanks,
Gary Lin
> Le mar. 16 janv. 2
I would suggest something a bit more descriptive than if 0. What about
#ifdef GRUB_SKIPPED_IMPORTING ?
Le mar. 16 janv. 2024, 12:24, Gary Lin via Grub-devel
a écrit :
> From: Daniel Axtens
>
> We don't expect to be able to write ASN.1, only read it,
> so we can disable some code.
>
> Do that wi
From: Daniel Axtens
We don't expect to be able to write ASN.1, only read it,
so we can disable some code.
Do that with #if 0/#endif, rather than deletion. This means
that the difference between upstream and grub is smaller,
which should make updating libtasn1 easier in the future.
With these ex
