On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:24:50PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Glenn Washburn writes:
>
> > GCC 5.1.0 looks like it came out on April 22, 2015[1] and 5.2 was used
> > in Ubuntu Xenial from 2016 (which is no longer supported). At what
> > point do we bump up the minimum supported version? And do
Glenn Washburn writes:
> GCC 5.1.0 looks like it came out on April 22, 2015[1] and 5.2 was used
> in Ubuntu Xenial from 2016 (which is no longer supported). At what
> point do we bump up the minimum supported version? And doing so
> wouldn't mean that GRUB can't be compiled with eariler versions
On 2/26/22 02:50, Glenn Washburn wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:17:51 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
The GRUB INSTALL file says:
The Requirements
GRUB depends on some software packages installed into your system. If
you don't have any of them, please obtain and install
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:17:51 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> The GRUB INSTALL file says:
>
> The Requirements
>
>
> GRUB depends on some software packages installed into your system. If
> you don't have any of them, please obtain and install them before
> configuring the G
Daniel Kiper writes:
> Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>> Also, gnulib's position on sign comparison issues is to ignore them,
>> so the "fix" from our end would probably be to pragma them
>
> Huh! Where did you see that? Could you point me a source where they
> say that thing?
"If -Wsign-compare compla
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:35:00PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Daniel Kiper writes:
>
> > Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >
> >> I don't get that, actually. What OS/gcc? It's fine with the gcc-11
> >> I'm using here.
> >
> > Does gcc-11 work with the configure mentioned above?
> >
> > Anyway, Debian
Daniel Kiper writes:
> Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>> I don't get that, actually. What OS/gcc? It's fine with the gcc-11
>> I'm using here.
>
> Does gcc-11 work with the configure mentioned above?
>
> Anyway, Debian 9, arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18) 6.3.0 20170516.
Yes, with arm-linux-g
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:44:37AM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Daniel Kiper writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:41:38PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> >> Changes in this version:
> >>
> >> - Include most _GL_* defines from gnulib. Hopefully we do not need all
> >> their
> >> prereq log
Daniel Kiper writes:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:41:38PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Changes in this version:
>>
>> - Include most _GL_* defines from gnulib. Hopefully we do not need all their
>> prereq logic as well, but I don't know what the compilers we support are,
>> so
>> please
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:41:38PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Changes in this version:
>
> - Include most _GL_* defines from gnulib. Hopefully we do not need all their
> prereq logic as well, but I don't know what the compilers we support are, so
> please correct that if needed.
>
> - Avoi
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:41:38 -0500
Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Changes in this version:
>
> - Include most _GL_* defines from gnulib. Hopefully we do not need all their
> prereq logic as well, but I don't know what the compilers we support are, so
> please correct that if needed.
>
> - Avoid c
Changes in this version:
- Include most _GL_* defines from gnulib. Hopefully we do not need all their
prereq logic as well, but I don't know what the compilers we support are, so
please correct that if needed.
- Avoid creating empty #defines.
- Fix issues with building gnulib's allocation m
12 matches
Mail list logo