On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:51:09AM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:25:44 +0100
> Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:26:29PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > The member found_uuid was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used
> > > to
> >
> > Ha! Cou
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 15:25:44 +0100
Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:26:29PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > The member found_uuid was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used to
>
> Ha! Could you make this patch second in this patch series? Then we could
> avoid carrying
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:26:29PM -0500, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> The member found_uuid was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used to
Ha! Could you make this patch second in this patch series? Then we could
avoid carrying over have_it/found_uuid cruft over succeeding patches.
> determine
The member found_uuid was never used by the crypto-backends, but was used to
determine if a crypto-backend successfully mounted a cryptodisk with a given
uuid. This is not needed however, because grub_device_iterate will return 1
iff grub_cryptodisk_scan_device returns 1. And grub_cryptodisk_scan_d
